Urth Net

Index · 8 messages · 5 voices · 22 Nov 2011

Personal attacks

Download this conversation
Mo Holkar22 Nov 2011, 15:09as archived
Personal attacks
Hi all, Guys, some of you are currently making this list a really annoying place to hang out -- to the extent that I'm just deleting threads unread. It always seems to be observations about one another's distasteful modes of discourse that gets us to this point. I would really like that to be a banned topic, as it seems never to be helpful or informative, but invariably produces a trail of vitriol. Could you please just lay off each other? best wishes, Mo # ~ # ~ # WolfeWiki -- a wiki about Gene Wolfe http://www.wolfewiki.com/pmwiki/
Ryan Dunn22 Nov 2011, 15:47as archived
↳ in reply to Mo Holkar
I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled Babbiecorn... for this very reason, Mo. There is a thin but important line between passionate discourse and slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of late. Thanks you for raising the concern. ...ryan
17 quoted lines
On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Mo Holkar <lists at ukg.co.uk> wrote: Hi all, Guys, some of you are currently making this list a really annoying place to hang out -- to the extent that I'm just deleting threads unread. It always seems to be observations about one another's distasteful modes of discourse that gets us to this point. I would really like that to be a banned topic, as it seems never to be helpful or informative, but invariably produces a trail of vitriol. Could you please just lay off each other? best wishes, Mo # ~ # ~ # WolfeWiki -- a wiki about Gene Wolfe http://www.wolfewiki.com/pmwiki/ _______________________________________________
Daniel Petersen22 Nov 2011, 15:59as archived
↳ in reply to Ryan Dunn
chimes in with similar sentiment to the others raising concerns -DOJP
26 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Ryan Dunn <ryan at liftingfaces.com> wrote: I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled Babbiecorn... for this very reason, Mo. There is a thin but important line between passionate discourse and slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of late. Thanks you for raising the concern. ...ryan On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Mo Holkar <lists at ukg.co.uk> wrote:
Hi all, Guys, some of you are currently making this list a really annoying place to hang out -- to the extent that I'm just deleting threads unread. It always seems to be observations about one another's distasteful modes of discourse that gets us to this point. I would really like that to be a banned topic, as it seems never to be helpful or informative, but invariably produces a trail of vitriol. Could you please just lay off each other? best wishes, Mo # ~ # ~ # WolfeWiki -- a wiki about Gene Wolfe http://www.wolfewiki.com/pmwiki/ _______________________________________________
António Pedro Marques22 Nov 2011, 16:02as archived
↳ in reply to Ryan Dunn
Ryan Dunn wrote (22-11-2011 15:47):
5 quoted lines
I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled Babbiecorn... for this very reason, Mo. There is a thin but important line between passionate discourse and slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of late. Thanks you for raising the concern.
I think it's quite clear when one goes from criticism of the other's ideas to criticism of the other's intelligence/education/motivations/persona. And I think whenever that line is crossed, moderation would be in order. You may have lost one or two interesting points by deleting the recent threads, but I don't think you need to worry.
Marc Aramini22 Nov 2011, 16:35as archived
↳ in reply to António Pedro Marques
20 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> wrote: From: Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> Subject: Re: (urth) Personal attacks To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net> Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 8:02 AM Ryan Dunn wrote (22-11-2011 15:47):
I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled Babbiecorn... for this very reason, Mo. There is a thin but important line between passionate discourse and slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of late. Thanks you for raising the concern.
I think it's quite clear when one goes from criticism of the other's ideas to criticism of the other's intelligence/education/motivations/persona. And I think whenever that line is crossed, moderation would be in order. You may have lost one or two interesting points by deleting the recent threads, but I don't think you need to worry. _______________________________________________
I really don't try to make anything personal, if I am guilty I apologize. It is unfortunate though, the topics I care about tend to generate into these "deleted unread" categories for most :( I started the Hunter in the East/Fitzgerald one and then just stood back as the stones flew. Sorry.
Daniel Petersen22 Nov 2011, 16:40as archived
↳ in reply to Marc Aramini
Wow, thanks for the admirable willingness to publicly apologise for any part you may have had in it, Marc. On a different but related note, is there a Wolfe scholar out there who could make a digest of the main outlines of the main arguments on this mega-behemoth of a list? -DOJP
30 quoted lines · 1–3 deep
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> wrote: --- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> Subject: Re: (urth) Personal attacks To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net> Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 8:02 AM Ryan Dunn wrote (22-11-2011 15:47):
I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled Babbiecorn... for this very reason, Mo. There is a thin but important line between passionate discourse and slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of late. Thanks you for raising the concern.
I think it's quite clear when one goes from criticism of the other's ideas to criticism of the other's intelligence/education/motivations/persona. And I think whenever that line is crossed, moderation would be in order. You may have lost one or two interesting points by deleting the recent threads, but I don't think you need to worry. _______________________________________________
I really don't try to make anything personal, if I am guilty I apologize. It is unfortunate though, the topics I care about tend to generate into these "deleted unread" categories for most :( I started the Hunter in the East/Fitzgerald one and then just stood back as the stones flew. Sorry. _______________________________________________
António Pedro Marques22 Nov 2011, 16:45as archived
↳ in reply to Marc Aramini
I don't think you have to apologise to anyone, Marc, I've never seen you write even a hint of a personal attack. It's true that some topics are livelier than others, but I don't think liveliness is the problem.
Ryan Dunn22 Nov 2011, 17:26as archived
↳ in reply to Daniel Petersen
My suspicion is that America may have a balanced budget before there is a streamlined Urth compendium. I think the trusty old search-for-keyword, followed by minutes-and-minutes of wheat and chaff separation is here to stay. ...ryan
36 quoted lines · 1–3 deep
On Nov 22, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Daniel Petersen <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com> wrote: Wow, thanks for the admirable willingness to publicly apologise for any part you may have had in it, Marc. On a different but related note, is there a Wolfe scholar out there who could make a digest of the main outlines of the main arguments on this mega-behemoth of a list? -DOJP On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> wrote: --- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> Subject: Re: (urth) Personal attacks To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net> Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 8:02 AM Ryan Dunn wrote (22-11-2011 15:47):
I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled Babbiecorn... for this very reason, Mo. There is a thin but important line between passionate discourse and slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of late. Thanks you for raising the concern.
I think it's quite clear when one goes from criticism of the other's ideas to criticism of the other's intelligence/education/motivations/persona. And I think whenever that line is crossed, moderation would be in order. You may have lost one or two interesting points by deleting the recent threads, but I don't think you need to worry. _______________________________________________
I really don't try to make anything personal, if I am guilty I apologize. It is unfortunate though, the topics I care about tend to generate into these "deleted unread" categories for most :( I started the Hunter in the East/Fitzgerald one and then just stood back as the stones flew. Sorry. _______________________________________________

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net