Did Pig Kill Silk?

The Whorl list — 2 messages, 1 voices, 19 Feb 2001
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/1201

James Jordan19 Feb 2001, 19:46original
Well, Borski has sure done a job for us. But I have one question: Pig says he killed an augur. Okay. But "Silk" is very much alive, as he knows as well as anyone. Thus, it does not appear to me that he could believe that he had killed Silk. I should think he would say, "I tried to kill an augur." I guess it also seems to me that Pig would have done a more thorough job. A bunch of cuts on the arms is not a good killing job. A beheading, or a thrust through the heart would be better. Of course, on your thesis, Silk had to be able to "revive," so "Tartaros" had to kill him in a rather "indirect" way. But my first question still stands. Untie this knot for me. Patera Nutria *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
James Jordan19 Feb 2001, 19:23original

↳ follows, by subject match James Jordan

Well, Borski has sure done a job for us. But I have one question: Pig says he killed an augur. Okay. But "Silk" is very much alive, as he knows as well as anyone. Thus, it does not appear to me that he could believe that he had killed Silk. I should think he would say, "I tried to kill an augur." I guess it also seems to me that Pig would have done a more thorough job. A bunch of cuts on the arms is not a good killing job. A beheading, or a thrust through the heart would be better. Of course, on your thesis, Silk had to be able to "revive," so "Tartaros" had to kill him in a rather "indirect" way. But my first question still stands. Untie this knot for me. Patera Nutria *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.