Crocagators
The Whorl list — 12 messages, 7 voices, 25 Apr 2001
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/1403
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes25 Apr 2001, 12:58original
6 quoted lines
The Kitchen Staff Wombat wrote:
My understanding is that the number of human attacks from
crocodilians is very low. They're much like wolves that
way--feared as human predators all out of proportion to the
actual danger they present. Which isn't to say that they
can't sometimes be very dangerous, indeed.
Which was pretty much my point. Assuming per argumentam the
"Golden Rule" theory of the Secret, and that the human
colonists somehow manage to implement it, then the inhumi
become "something we can live with," either as benevolent
sentients or as dangerous but mindless giant leeches.
In fact, there's some doubt in my mind as to how many
people are actually killed by the inhumi in the situation
which actually holds on Blue at the time of Horn's journey
-- I don't recall many examples of someone actually dying
from inhumi attacks [excepting the attack on the wedding,
as a very special special case]. Do the inhumi, like wolves,
bears, sharks, snakes, crocodilians... suffer from
exaggerated human fears as to the extent of the danger they
pose?
I somewhat doubt it, on the grounds that the inhumi (at
least in the form we know) are far smarter than wolves,
bears, etc., and able to "pass" as humans: a combination
that makes one inhumu potentially far more dangerous in
the long term than a good-sized pack of wolves. But the
Bluvian scenes in SHORT simply don't seem to reflect a
people in imminent danger of being wiped out by predators.
I dunno. There's something weird missing here, what it
is ain't exactly clear...
*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
↳ follows, by subject match Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
41 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
At 12:58 PM 25-04-01 -0700, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
The Kitchen Staff Wombat wrote:
My understanding is that the
number of human attacks from
crocodilians is very low. They're
much like wolves that way--
feared as human predators all
out of proportion to the actual
danger they present. Which isn't
to say that they can't sometimes
be very dangerous, indeed.
Which was pretty much my point. Assuming per argu-
mentam the "Golden Rule" theory of the Secret, and
that the human colonists somehow manage to imple-
ment it, then the inhumi become "something we can live
with," either as benevolent sentients or as dangerous but
mindless giant leeches.
In fact, there's some doubt in my mind as to how many
people are actually killed by the inhumi in the situation
which actually holds on Blue at the time of Horn's jour-
ney -- I don't recall many examples of someone actually
dying from inhumi attacks [excepting the attack on the
wedding, as a very special special case]. Do the inhumi,
like wolves, bears, sharks, snakes, crocodilians... suffer
from exaggerated human fears as to the extent of the
danger they pose?
I somewhat doubt it, on the grounds that the inhumi (at
least in the form we know) are far smarter than wolves,
bears, etc., and able to "pass" as humans: a combination
that makes one inhumu potentially far more dangerous in
the long term than a good-sized pack of wolves. But the
Bluvian scenes in SHORT simply don't seem to reflect a
people in imminent danger of being wiped out by
predators.
I dunno. There's something weird missing here, what
it is ain't exactly clear...
--Blattid
At the risk of being obvious, allow me to point out that, unlike the inhumi, wolves, bears, sharks, snakes, crocodilians, and the like do not preferentially target humans as their prey.
Also, as I recall (and I'm afraid that I don't have the book here for reference, so we'll have to depend on my recollection), Fava had to be very careful not to kill Salica when she fed from the old woman. If Fava hadn't been living with the family at the time, she very likely would have been less careful. (If anyone is likely to die from the inhumi's depredations, it would be the old, the very young, and the sick; curiously, though, even the baby Sinew was not killed when he was attacked. I wonder whether this may be a clue; thank you for bringing it up, Dan'l.) I do have to agree with Dan'l, though; the inhumi aren't going to kill off Blue's human population any time soon.
Nacre
*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
William Ansley25 Apr 2001, 22:31original
↳ follows, by subject match mark millman
2 quoted lines
At 5:30 PM -0400 4/25/01, mark millman wrote:
At the risk of being obvious, allow me to point out that, unlike the inhumi, wolves, bears, sharks, snakes, crocodilians, and the like do not preferentially target humans as their prey.
I don't think that "dumb" inhumi would preferentially target humans as their host. As I read the text, it was just an accident that the inhumi first fed upon the Neighbors and became sentient.
8 quoted lines
At 11:03 AM -0700 4/25/01, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
(As a side note, how many people are actually attacked by alligators and the like in a given year? I presume that proper precautions could make the threat from non-sentient inhumi no greater than that from crocodilians.)
At 12:58 PM -0700 4/25/01, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
Which was pretty much my point. Assuming per argumentam the
"Golden Rule" theory of the Secret, and that the human
colonists somehow manage to implement it, then the inhumi
become "something we can live with," either as benevolent
sentients or as dangerous but mindless giant leeches.
I think "mindless giant leeches" that can fly would be a much greater threat that crocodiles. It is easy to stay away from crocodiles, you just don't go near the river/lake they live in. (Unless, of course, it is your only source of drinking water.)
Inhumi, on the other hand, can fly so you can't avoid them. I would think, although I can't recall a specific example of this, that they could also squeeze through very small openings, since they have no bones.
Certainly, dumb inhumi would be orders of magnitude easier to defend against that smart ones, but I think it would be more difficult than you suggest.
William Ansley
*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
↳ follows, by subject match William Ansley
Nacre has written:
<Also, as I recall (and I'm afraid that I don't have the book here for reference, so we'll have to depend on my recollection), Fava had to be very careful not to kill Salica when she fed from the old woman. If Fava hadn't been living with the family at the time, she very likely would have been less careful. (If anyone is likely to die from the inhumi's depredations, it would be the old, the very young, and the sick; curiously, though, even the baby Sinew was not killed when he was attacked. I wonder whether this may be a clue; thank you for bringing it up, Dan'l.) I do have to agree with Dan'l, though; the inhumi aren't going to kill off Blue's human population any time soon.>
Or even at all, for as Jahlee tells Horn in IGJ p. 377, "I drink blood. Human blood mostly. We don't kill you though. At least very often."
Granted, it's in Jahlee's best interests to fudge the truth a bit, but does anyone that we know of in either the Long or Short books actually succumb fatally to an inhumu's bite? I don't recollect a single person. Therefore the comparison with leeches--who only kill those with hereditary or spontaneous idiopathic coagulopathies--is probably dead on.
Robert Borski
*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Adam Stephanides26 Apr 2001, 09:58original
↳ follows, by subject match Robert Borski
8 quoted lines
on 4/26/01 1:18 AM, Robert Borski at rborski at charter.net wrote: Nacre has written:
<I do have to agree with Dan'l, though; the
inhumi aren't going to kill off Blue's human population any time soon.>
Or even at all, for as Jahlee tells Horn in IGJ p. 377, "I drink blood. Human blood mostly. We don't kill you though. At least very often."
Granted, it's in Jahlee's best interests to fudge the truth a bit, but does anyone that we know of in either the Long or Short books actually succumb fatally to an inhumu's bite? I don't recollect a single person. Therefore the comparison with leeches--who only kill those with hereditary or spontaneous idiopathic coagulopathies--is probably dead on.
There are the thousand of dead bodies in the sewer on Green, whom Horn says have "bled to death" (IGJ, 380); and elsewhere, iirc, Horn says or implies that the inhumi on Green drain the bodies of their slaves when they get too old to work or fight. And Horn, who should know, thinks that Juganu might kill him by drinking his fill; and that if Juganu brought companions he "would certainly die" (but this, as Horn anticipates it, would be premeditated murder by Juganu, not the typical opportunistic inhumi attack) (RttW, 403). But I agree that inhumi attacks do seem to be rarely fatal on Blue, perhaps because on Blue they rarely have the chance to drink their fill without being disturbed. And the inhumi are not going to wipe out the humans of Blue: aside from anything else, in doing so they would be eliminating their main source of human blood. A more realistic danger is that the inhumi would gain control over the humans on Blue, as they have over the Pajarocans and most of those on Green.
--Adam
*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes26 Apr 2001, 08:48original
↳ follows, by subject match Adam Stephanides
2 quoted lines
Mark Millman wrote:
At the risk of being obvious, allow me to point out that, unlike the inhumi, wolves, bears, sharks, snakes, crocodilians, and the like do not preferentially target humans as their prey.
At the risk of being contentious, let me observe that only the sentient inhumi do so. But in the universe-of-discourse where humans have come to "love one another," the sentient inhumi will very specifically not target humans; and the non-sentient inhumi, well, won't.
a) Special case: Given that the sentient inhumi have
developed "human souls," it is possible and even
somewhat likely that at least some humans will choose
to voluntarily give blood to sentient inhumi so that
their children will also have "human souls." This,
of course, is not a "danger" situation at all; in
fact, this may represent the ideal state of society
on the Short Sun whorls: humans deliberately giving
blood voluntarily to all inhumi, so the nextgen of
inhumi (and thereafter) will be non-threatening,
sentient inhumi, who will continue to take blood given
voluntarily by humans, etc. (Consider also in this
context Octavia Estelle Butler's horrendously effective
story "Bloodchild.")
1 quoted line
Also, as I recall (and I'm afraid that I don't have the book here for reference, so we'll have to depend on my recollection), Fava had to be very careful not to kill Salica when she fed from the old woman.
My recollection also.
1 quoted line
If Fava hadn't been living with the family at the time, she very likely would have been less careful.
Are you sure? I'm not. Again, death-by-inhumi-attack seems to be
exceedingly rare.
--Dan'l
*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Kevin J. Maroney26 Apr 2001, 12:44original
↳ follows, by subject match Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
3 quoted lines
At 09:58 AM 4/26/01 -0500, Adam wrote:
But I agree that inhumi attacks do seem to be rarely fatal on
Blue, perhaps because on Blue they rarely have the chance to drink their fill without being disturbed.
Though it is worth noting that though Quetzal does not kill Teazel (I think that's her name), he has fed off her more than once and she is near death when Silk treats her. Quetzal was also very smart for an inhumu.
Wombat, a.k.a. Kevin Maroney kmaroney at ungames.com
Kitchen Staff Supervisor, New York Review of Science Fiction
http://www.nyrsf.com
*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
↳ follows, by subject match Kevin J. Maroney
33 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
At 08:48 AM 26-04-01 -0700, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
Mark Millman wrote:
At the risk of being obvious,
allow me to point out that,
unlike the inhumi, wolves,
bears, sharks, snakes, croco-
dilians, and the like do not
preferentially target humans
as their prey.
At the risk of being contentious, let me observe that only
the sentient inhumi do so. But in the universe-of-discourse
where humans have come to "love one another," the sen-
tient inhumi will very specifically not target humans;
and the non-sentient inhumi, well, won't.
[snip]
Also, as I recall (and I'm
afraid that I don't have the
book here for reference,
so we'll have to depend on
my recollection), Fava had
to be very careful not to
kill Salica when she fed from
the old woman.
My recollection also.
If Fava hadn't been living
with the family at the time,
she very likely would have
been less careful.
Are you sure? I'm not. Again, death-by-inhumi-attack
seems to be exceedingly rare.
--Dan'l
Contention welcomed, Dan'l. It's true that only the sentient inhumi specifically target humans; but then it's equally true that these are ex- actly the inhumi that the human population of Blue fears; and I'd be surprised if there were many non-sentient inhumi loose on Blue. The sentient inhumi are as much a source of fear as the (much less common) man-eating shark or tiger or wolf-pack is on Earth, and are the ones that humans would have to bring themselves to accept in an agape-driven world (though the entire humanization-of-the- inhumi-by-voluntary-blood-donation scenario is now discredited).
You are right to say that we hardly hear of any deaths from the inhumi's depredations in Short Sun (and of course this has now been discussed at greater length on the list), but there are examples in which victims have been left in a very bad way indeed. Kevin Maroney mentions Teazel in Long Sun, and I recall that General Oosik's son (is his name Muktuk?--again, I don't have the book for reference) is drained so badly that he loses consciousness, leaving him so weak that he cannot stand. These attacks may not be char- acteristic of the situation on Blue, but do demonstrate that inhumi can probably kill if they're so minded (or if they misjudge, etc.). Blue is also a colony world, and there seem to be enough dangers aside from the inhumi that one probably wouldn't want to go around in a condition of chronic weakness from blood loss.
Mark
*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
↳ follows, by subject match mark millman
33 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
At 08:48 AM 26-04-01 -0700, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
Mark Millman wrote:
At the risk of being obvious,
allow me to point out that,
unlike the inhumi, wolves,
bears, sharks, snakes, croco-
dilians, and the like do not
preferentially target humans
as their prey.
At the risk of being contentious, let me observe that only
the sentient inhumi do so. But in the universe-of-discourse
where humans have come to "love one another," the sen-
tient inhumi will very specifically not target humans;
and the non-sentient inhumi, well, won't.
[snip]
Also, as I recall (and I'm
afraid that I don't have the
book here for reference,
so we'll have to depend on
my recollection), Fava had
to be very careful not to
kill Salica when she fed from
the old woman.
My recollection also.
If Fava hadn't been living
with the family at the time,
she very likely would have
been less careful.
Are you sure? I'm not. Again, death-by-inhumi-attack
seems to be exceedingly rare.
--Dan'l
Contention welcomed, Dan'l. It's true that only the sentient inhumi specifically target humans; but then it's equally true that these are ex- actly the inhumi that the human population of Blue fears; and I'd be surprised if there were many non-sentient inhumi loose on Blue. The sentient inhumi are as much a source of fear as the (much less common) man-eating shark or tiger or wolf-pack is on Earth, and are the ones that humans would have to bring themselves to accept in an agape-driven world (though the entire humanization-of-the- inhumi-by-voluntary-blood-donation scenario is now discredited).
You are right to say that we hardly hear of any deaths from the inhumi's depredations in Short Sun (and of course this has now been discussed at greater length on the list), but there are examples in which victims have been left in a very bad way indeed. Kevin Maroney mentions Teazel in Long Sun, and I recall that General Oosik's son (is his name Muktuk?--again, I don't have the book for reference) is drained so badly that he loses consciousness, leaving him so weak that he cannot stand. These attacks may not be char- acteristic of the situation on Blue, but do demonstrate that inhumi can probably kill if they're so minded (or if they misjudge, etc.). Blue is also a colony world, and there seem to be enough dangers aside from the inhumi that one probably wouldn't want to go around in a condition of chronic weakness from blood loss.
Mark
*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
↳ follows, by subject match mark millman
2 quoted lines
Kevin Maroney wrote:
Though it is worth noting that though Quetzal does not kill Teazel (I think that's her name), he has fed off her more than once and she is near death when Silk treats her. Quetzal was also very smart for an inhumu.
Quetzal may have been the descendant of inhumi who drank from Neighbors, thus possessing other-than-human intelligence (at least, as Dan'l Danehy-Oakes argues, prior to consuming human blood). That still leaves the question of how Quetzal got to the Loganstone.
Quetzal might have been the offspring of the hypothesized inhumi who were taken with the Neighbors. He might have been born on Green, however. If several generations of inhumi had passed since the Neighbors left, this implies that the trait of augmented intelligence lasts--which has implications for the nature of the weapon too heavy to bear. Of course, inhumi might simply live a very long time.
There are other possibilities, of course. But it seems likely that Inhumi can travel through space (beyond the mesosphere, or the 'Green' equivalent), or had access to craft that could allow space travel, or had friends who dropped one or two off, or I've forgotten something from the Long Sun series.
Jason
*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes30 Apr 2001, 08:46original
↳ follows, by subject match Jason Ingram
3 quoted lines
Jason wrote:
Quetzal might have been the offspring of the hypothesized
inhumi who were taken with the Neighbors.
They're not "hypothesized," dammit. The Neighbors say so,
in RETURN. (Don't ask me for a page cite, though; my copies
of SHORT are out on loan and won't be back for a while.)
1 quoted line
He might have been born on Green, however.
The word seems to be "must." It appears that the inhumi can
only breed on Green.
1 quoted line
If several generations of inhumi had passed since the Neighbors left,
There are implications that it has been only a short time --
I believe I first got that impression on the island with the
not-very-ruined Neighbor-place in BLUE.
*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
↳ follows, by subject match Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
[re: inhumi taken along with the Nieghbors]
3 quoted lines
They're not "hypothesized," dammit. The Neighbors say so,
in RETURN. (Don't ask me for a page cite, though; my copies
of SHORT are out on loan and won't be back for a while.)
Fine; assume the Neighbors never lie and that the narrator is 100% trustworthy. That's a reasonable hypothesis, but nevertheless an assumption.
The important aspect of that assumption (or "fact," whatever) lies in the effects of the interaction of abilities that enables astral travel, or bilocation. Maybe the Neighbors can do some things by themselves, others only with the inhumi. Maybe thinking about the relation between Horn's ability to bilocate in terms of his movement into Silk, as it were, and the presence of inhumi might shed some light on the pesky question of astral travel.
I'm also curious about Quetzal's lineage, but that seems to be a minor thread.
4 quoted lines
> He [Quetzal] might have been born on Green, however.
The word seems to be "must." It appears that the inhumi can
only breed on Green.
We don't really know much about the abilities of the Neighbors. They might be able to replicate inhumi breeding conditions. They might not. Our access to the "truth" of these matters is so buffered that guarded terms are more appropriate. If "seems to be" and "appear" work better, use those words instead of "might."
Again, the question here is-- if Quetzal was born on Green, by what means did he make his way to the Loganstone. If by ship, whose, and to what end did they assist him? If by other means, which? (inhumi flying through space, randomly seeking out hosts? inhumi flying through space pursuing objects perceived with their incredibly superior perception?) The answer might prove interesting; I'm not sure.
6 quoted lines
> If several generations of inhumi had passed since the Neighbors
> left,
There are implications that it has been only a short time --
I believe I first got that impression on the island with the
not-very-ruined Neighbor-place in BLUE.
Agreed. However, a short time could mean centuries, or decades, depending on the technology involved and the degree of ruin. Since we don't know (or, more precisely, since I can't recall any statements on this matter) the inhumi lifespan, this could involve generations. Still speculation, but pertinent for determining whether intelligence passes to grandchildren.
Jason
*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.