Urth Net

Index · 12 messages · 7 voices · 25 Apr – 01 May 2001

CrocagatorsWhorl

Download this conversation
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes25 Apr 2001, 12:58originalas archived
Crocagators
6 quoted lines
The Kitchen Staff Wombat wrote: My understanding is that the number of human attacks from crocodilians is very low. They're much like wolves that way--feared as human predators all out of proportion to the actual danger they present. Which isn't to say that they can't sometimes be very dangerous, indeed.
Which was pretty much my point. Assuming per argumentam the "Golden Rule" theory of the Secret, and that the human colonists somehow manage to implement it, then the inhumi become "something we can live with," either as benevolent sentients or as dangerous but mindless giant leeches. In fact, there's some doubt in my mind as to how many people are actually killed by the inhumi in the situation which actually holds on Blue at the time of Horn's journey -- I don't recall many examples of someone actually dying from inhumi attacks [excepting the attack on the wedding, as a very special special case]. Do the inhumi, like wolves, bears, sharks, snakes, crocodilians... suffer from exaggerated human fears as to the extent of the danger they pose? I somewhat doubt it, on the grounds that the inhumi (at least in the form we know) are far smarter than wolves, bears, etc., and able to "pass" as humans: a combination that makes one inhumu potentially far more dangerous in the long term than a good-sized pack of wolves. But the Bluvian scenes in SHORT simply don't seem to reflect a people in imminent danger of being wiped out by predators. I dunno. There's something weird missing here, what it is ain't exactly clear... *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
mark millman25 Apr 2001, 17:30originalas archived
↳ follows Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · by subject
41 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
At 12:58 PM 25-04-01 -0700, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: The Kitchen Staff Wombat wrote:
My understanding is that the number of human attacks from crocodilians is very low. They're much like wolves that way-- feared as human predators all out of proportion to the actual danger they present. Which isn't to say that they can't sometimes be very dangerous, indeed.
Which was pretty much my point. Assuming per argu- mentam the "Golden Rule" theory of the Secret, and that the human colonists somehow manage to imple- ment it, then the inhumi become "something we can live with," either as benevolent sentients or as dangerous but mindless giant leeches. In fact, there's some doubt in my mind as to how many people are actually killed by the inhumi in the situation which actually holds on Blue at the time of Horn's jour- ney -- I don't recall many examples of someone actually dying from inhumi attacks [excepting the attack on the wedding, as a very special special case]. Do the inhumi, like wolves, bears, sharks, snakes, crocodilians... suffer from exaggerated human fears as to the extent of the danger they pose? I somewhat doubt it, on the grounds that the inhumi (at least in the form we know) are far smarter than wolves, bears, etc., and able to "pass" as humans: a combination that makes one inhumu potentially far more dangerous in the long term than a good-sized pack of wolves. But the Bluvian scenes in SHORT simply don't seem to reflect a people in imminent danger of being wiped out by predators. I dunno. There's something weird missing here, what it is ain't exactly clear... --Blattid
At the risk of being obvious, allow me to point out that, unlike the inhumi, wolves, bears, sharks, snakes, crocodilians, and the like do not preferentially target humans as their prey. Also, as I recall (and I'm afraid that I don't have the book here for reference, so we'll have to depend on my recollection), Fava had to be very careful not to kill Salica when she fed from the old woman. If Fava hadn't been living with the family at the time, she very likely would have been less careful. (If anyone is likely to die from the inhumi's depredations, it would be the old, the very young, and the sick; curiously, though, even the baby Sinew was not killed when he was attacked. I wonder whether this may be a clue; thank you for bringing it up, Dan'l.) I do have to agree with Dan'l, though; the inhumi aren't going to kill off Blue's human population any time soon. Nacre *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
William Ansley25 Apr 2001, 22:31originalas archived
↳ follows mark millman · by subject
2 quoted lines
At 5:30 PM -0400 4/25/01, mark millman wrote: At the risk of being obvious, allow me to point out that, unlike the inhumi, wolves, bears, sharks, snakes, crocodilians, and the like do not preferentially target humans as their prey.
I don't think that "dumb" inhumi would preferentially target humans as their host. As I read the text, it was just an accident that the inhumi first fed upon the Neighbors and became sentient.
8 quoted lines
At 11:03 AM -0700 4/25/01, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: (As a side note, how many people are actually attacked by alligators and the like in a given year? I presume that proper precautions could make the threat from non-sentient inhumi no greater than that from crocodilians.)
At 12:58 PM -0700 4/25/01, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: Which was pretty much my point. Assuming per argumentam the "Golden Rule" theory of the Secret, and that the human colonists somehow manage to implement it, then the inhumi become "something we can live with," either as benevolent sentients or as dangerous but mindless giant leeches.
I think "mindless giant leeches" that can fly would be a much greater threat that crocodiles. It is easy to stay away from crocodiles, you just don't go near the river/lake they live in. (Unless, of course, it is your only source of drinking water.) Inhumi, on the other hand, can fly so you can't avoid them. I would think, although I can't recall a specific example of this, that they could also squeeze through very small openings, since they have no bones. Certainly, dumb inhumi would be orders of magnitude easier to defend against that smart ones, but I think it would be more difficult than you suggest. William Ansley *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Robert Borski26 Apr 2001, 01:18originalas archived
↳ follows William Ansley · by subject
Nacre has written: <Also, as I recall (and I'm afraid that I don't have the book here for reference, so we'll have to depend on my recollection), Fava had to be very careful not to kill Salica when she fed from the old woman. If Fava hadn't been living with the family at the time, she very likely would have been less careful. (If anyone is likely to die from the inhumi's depredations, it would be the old, the very young, and the sick; curiously, though, even the baby Sinew was not killed when he was attacked. I wonder whether this may be a clue; thank you for bringing it up, Dan'l.) I do have to agree with Dan'l, though; the inhumi aren't going to kill off Blue's human population any time soon.> Or even at all, for as Jahlee tells Horn in IGJ p. 377, "I drink blood. Human blood mostly. We don't kill you though. At least very often." Granted, it's in Jahlee's best interests to fudge the truth a bit, but does anyone that we know of in either the Long or Short books actually succumb fatally to an inhumu's bite? I don't recollect a single person. Therefore the comparison with leeches--who only kill those with hereditary or spontaneous idiopathic coagulopathies--is probably dead on. Robert Borski *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Adam Stephanides26 Apr 2001, 09:58originalas archived
↳ follows Robert Borski · by subject
8 quoted lines
on 4/26/01 1:18 AM, Robert Borski at rborski at charter.net wrote: Nacre has written: <I do have to agree with Dan'l, though; the inhumi aren't going to kill off Blue's human population any time soon.> Or even at all, for as Jahlee tells Horn in IGJ p. 377, "I drink blood. Human blood mostly. We don't kill you though. At least very often." Granted, it's in Jahlee's best interests to fudge the truth a bit, but does anyone that we know of in either the Long or Short books actually succumb fatally to an inhumu's bite? I don't recollect a single person. Therefore the comparison with leeches--who only kill those with hereditary or spontaneous idiopathic coagulopathies--is probably dead on.
There are the thousand of dead bodies in the sewer on Green, whom Horn says have "bled to death" (IGJ, 380); and elsewhere, iirc, Horn says or implies that the inhumi on Green drain the bodies of their slaves when they get too old to work or fight. And Horn, who should know, thinks that Juganu might kill him by drinking his fill; and that if Juganu brought companions he "would certainly die" (but this, as Horn anticipates it, would be premeditated murder by Juganu, not the typical opportunistic inhumi attack) (RttW, 403). But I agree that inhumi attacks do seem to be rarely fatal on Blue, perhaps because on Blue they rarely have the chance to drink their fill without being disturbed. And the inhumi are not going to wipe out the humans of Blue: aside from anything else, in doing so they would be eliminating their main source of human blood. A more realistic danger is that the inhumi would gain control over the humans on Blue, as they have over the Pajarocans and most of those on Green. --Adam *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes26 Apr 2001, 08:48originalas archived
↳ follows Adam Stephanides · by subject
2 quoted lines
Mark Millman wrote: At the risk of being obvious, allow me to point out that, unlike the inhumi, wolves, bears, sharks, snakes, crocodilians, and the like do not preferentially target humans as their prey.
At the risk of being contentious, let me observe that only the sentient inhumi do so. But in the universe-of-discourse where humans have come to "love one another," the sentient inhumi will very specifically not target humans; and the non-sentient inhumi, well, won't. a) Special case: Given that the sentient inhumi have developed "human souls," it is possible and even somewhat likely that at least some humans will choose to voluntarily give blood to sentient inhumi so that their children will also have "human souls." This, of course, is not a "danger" situation at all; in fact, this may represent the ideal state of society on the Short Sun whorls: humans deliberately giving blood voluntarily to all inhumi, so the nextgen of inhumi (and thereafter) will be non-threatening, sentient inhumi, who will continue to take blood given voluntarily by humans, etc. (Consider also in this context Octavia Estelle Butler's horrendously effective story "Bloodchild.")
1 quoted line
Also, as I recall (and I'm afraid that I don't have the book here for reference, so we'll have to depend on my recollection), Fava had to be very careful not to kill Salica when she fed from the old woman.
My recollection also.
1 quoted line
If Fava hadn't been living with the family at the time, she very likely would have been less careful.
Are you sure? I'm not. Again, death-by-inhumi-attack seems to be exceedingly rare. --Dan'l *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Kevin J. Maroney26 Apr 2001, 12:44originalas archived
↳ follows Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · by subject
3 quoted lines
At 09:58 AM 4/26/01 -0500, Adam wrote: But I agree that inhumi attacks do seem to be rarely fatal on Blue, perhaps because on Blue they rarely have the chance to drink their fill without being disturbed.
Though it is worth noting that though Quetzal does not kill Teazel (I think that's her name), he has fed off her more than once and she is near death when Silk treats her. Quetzal was also very smart for an inhumu.
Wombat, a.k.a. Kevin Maroney kmaroney at ungames.com Kitchen Staff Supervisor, New York Review of Science Fiction http://www.nyrsf.com *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
mark millman27 Apr 2001, 11:25originalas archived
↳ follows Kevin J. Maroney · by subject
33 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
At 08:48 AM 26-04-01 -0700, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: Mark Millman wrote:
At the risk of being obvious, allow me to point out that, unlike the inhumi, wolves, bears, sharks, snakes, croco- dilians, and the like do not preferentially target humans as their prey.
At the risk of being contentious, let me observe that only the sentient inhumi do so. But in the universe-of-discourse where humans have come to "love one another," the sen- tient inhumi will very specifically not target humans; and the non-sentient inhumi, well, won't. [snip]
Also, as I recall (and I'm afraid that I don't have the book here for reference, so we'll have to depend on my recollection), Fava had to be very careful not to kill Salica when she fed from the old woman.
My recollection also.
If Fava hadn't been living with the family at the time, she very likely would have been less careful.
Are you sure? I'm not. Again, death-by-inhumi-attack seems to be exceedingly rare. --Dan'l
Contention welcomed, Dan'l. It's true that only the sentient inhumi specifically target humans; but then it's equally true that these are ex- actly the inhumi that the human population of Blue fears; and I'd be surprised if there were many non-sentient inhumi loose on Blue. The sentient inhumi are as much a source of fear as the (much less common) man-eating shark or tiger or wolf-pack is on Earth, and are the ones that humans would have to bring themselves to accept in an agape-driven world (though the entire humanization-of-the- inhumi-by-voluntary-blood-donation scenario is now discredited). You are right to say that we hardly hear of any deaths from the inhumi's depredations in Short Sun (and of course this has now been discussed at greater length on the list), but there are examples in which victims have been left in a very bad way indeed. Kevin Maroney mentions Teazel in Long Sun, and I recall that General Oosik's son (is his name Muktuk?--again, I don't have the book for reference) is drained so badly that he loses consciousness, leaving him so weak that he cannot stand. These attacks may not be char- acteristic of the situation on Blue, but do demonstrate that inhumi can probably kill if they're so minded (or if they misjudge, etc.). Blue is also a colony world, and there seem to be enough dangers aside from the inhumi that one probably wouldn't want to go around in a condition of chronic weakness from blood loss. Mark *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
mark millman27 Apr 2001, 11:25originalas archived
↳ follows mark millman · by subject
33 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
At 08:48 AM 26-04-01 -0700, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: Mark Millman wrote:
At the risk of being obvious, allow me to point out that, unlike the inhumi, wolves, bears, sharks, snakes, croco- dilians, and the like do not preferentially target humans as their prey.
At the risk of being contentious, let me observe that only the sentient inhumi do so. But in the universe-of-discourse where humans have come to "love one another," the sen- tient inhumi will very specifically not target humans; and the non-sentient inhumi, well, won't. [snip]
Also, as I recall (and I'm afraid that I don't have the book here for reference, so we'll have to depend on my recollection), Fava had to be very careful not to kill Salica when she fed from the old woman.
My recollection also.
If Fava hadn't been living with the family at the time, she very likely would have been less careful.
Are you sure? I'm not. Again, death-by-inhumi-attack seems to be exceedingly rare. --Dan'l
Contention welcomed, Dan'l. It's true that only the sentient inhumi specifically target humans; but then it's equally true that these are ex- actly the inhumi that the human population of Blue fears; and I'd be surprised if there were many non-sentient inhumi loose on Blue. The sentient inhumi are as much a source of fear as the (much less common) man-eating shark or tiger or wolf-pack is on Earth, and are the ones that humans would have to bring themselves to accept in an agape-driven world (though the entire humanization-of-the- inhumi-by-voluntary-blood-donation scenario is now discredited). You are right to say that we hardly hear of any deaths from the inhumi's depredations in Short Sun (and of course this has now been discussed at greater length on the list), but there are examples in which victims have been left in a very bad way indeed. Kevin Maroney mentions Teazel in Long Sun, and I recall that General Oosik's son (is his name Muktuk?--again, I don't have the book for reference) is drained so badly that he loses consciousness, leaving him so weak that he cannot stand. These attacks may not be char- acteristic of the situation on Blue, but do demonstrate that inhumi can probably kill if they're so minded (or if they misjudge, etc.). Blue is also a colony world, and there seem to be enough dangers aside from the inhumi that one probably wouldn't want to go around in a condition of chronic weakness from blood loss. Mark *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Jason Ingram27 Apr 2001, 22:34originalas archived
↳ follows mark millman · by subject
2 quoted lines
Kevin Maroney wrote: Though it is worth noting that though Quetzal does not kill Teazel (I think that's her name), he has fed off her more than once and she is near death when Silk treats her. Quetzal was also very smart for an inhumu.
Quetzal may have been the descendant of inhumi who drank from Neighbors, thus possessing other-than-human intelligence (at least, as Dan'l Danehy-Oakes argues, prior to consuming human blood). That still leaves the question of how Quetzal got to the Loganstone. Quetzal might have been the offspring of the hypothesized inhumi who were taken with the Neighbors. He might have been born on Green, however. If several generations of inhumi had passed since the Neighbors left, this implies that the trait of augmented intelligence lasts--which has implications for the nature of the weapon too heavy to bear. Of course, inhumi might simply live a very long time. There are other possibilities, of course. But it seems likely that Inhumi can travel through space (beyond the mesosphere, or the 'Green' equivalent), or had access to craft that could allow space travel, or had friends who dropped one or two off, or I've forgotten something from the Long Sun series. Jason *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes30 Apr 2001, 08:46originalas archived
↳ follows Jason Ingram · by subject
3 quoted lines
Jason wrote: Quetzal might have been the offspring of the hypothesized inhumi who were taken with the Neighbors.
They're not "hypothesized," dammit. The Neighbors say so, in RETURN. (Don't ask me for a page cite, though; my copies of SHORT are out on loan and won't be back for a while.)
1 quoted line
He might have been born on Green, however.
The word seems to be "must." It appears that the inhumi can only breed on Green.
1 quoted line
If several generations of inhumi had passed since the Neighbors left,
There are implications that it has been only a short time -- I believe I first got that impression on the island with the not-very-ruined Neighbor-place in BLUE. *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Jason Ingram01 May 2001, 19:47originalas archived
↳ follows Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · by subject
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: [re: inhumi taken along with the Nieghbors]
3 quoted lines
They're not "hypothesized," dammit. The Neighbors say so, in RETURN. (Don't ask me for a page cite, though; my copies of SHORT are out on loan and won't be back for a while.)
Fine; assume the Neighbors never lie and that the narrator is 100% trustworthy. That's a reasonable hypothesis, but nevertheless an assumption. The important aspect of that assumption (or "fact," whatever) lies in the effects of the interaction of abilities that enables astral travel, or bilocation. Maybe the Neighbors can do some things by themselves, others only with the inhumi. Maybe thinking about the relation between Horn's ability to bilocate in terms of his movement into Silk, as it were, and the presence of inhumi might shed some light on the pesky question of astral travel. I'm also curious about Quetzal's lineage, but that seems to be a minor thread.
4 quoted lines
> He [Quetzal] might have been born on Green, however. The word seems to be "must." It appears that the inhumi can only breed on Green.
We don't really know much about the abilities of the Neighbors. They might be able to replicate inhumi breeding conditions. They might not. Our access to the "truth" of these matters is so buffered that guarded terms are more appropriate. If "seems to be" and "appear" work better, use those words instead of "might." Again, the question here is-- if Quetzal was born on Green, by what means did he make his way to the Loganstone. If by ship, whose, and to what end did they assist him? If by other means, which? (inhumi flying through space, randomly seeking out hosts? inhumi flying through space pursuing objects perceived with their incredibly superior perception?) The answer might prove interesting; I'm not sure.
6 quoted lines
> If several generations of inhumi had passed since the Neighbors > left, There are implications that it has been only a short time -- I believe I first got that impression on the island with the not-very-ruined Neighbor-place in BLUE.
Agreed. However, a short time could mean centuries, or decades, depending on the technology involved and the degree of ruin. Since we don't know (or, more precisely, since I can't recall any statements on this matter) the inhumi lifespan, this could involve generations. Still speculation, but pertinent for determining whether intelligence passes to grandchildren. Jason *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net