Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Gene Wolfe

Stephen Harker · 02 Apr 1992, 07:43 · from sf-lovers.1992.mbox

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: phs172m at vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au (Stephen Harker)
Subject: Re: Gene Wolfe
Date: 2 Apr 92 07:43:40 GMT
Message-ID: <sflovers-v17-160-5 at digest.sf-lovers>
X-Digest-Issue: SF-LOVERS Digest V17 #160
X-Urthmirror-Source: https://archive.org/details/sf-lovers-digest-vol-17a

>> Someone actually wants _more_ Gene Wolfes?!?  What a painful thought!
>> Reading his Torturer stuff was one of the most painful things I've ever
>> done. There was no point, very little plot, and way too much
>> foreshadowing.  It was a collection of images which went from unusual to
>> completely whacked-out.  Why anyone would seek out more of this dreck is
>> completely beyond me.
[Quite a bit of stuff deleted] 
>
> Gene Wolfe is perhaps the best science fiction / fantasy author writing
> today.  Although I enjoyed his Torturer series, I do not think it
> showcases his talents as well as There Are Doors, The Death of Doctor
> Island, or many of the short stories reprinted in Endangered Species.
>
> There is no kitsch or melodrama in Wolfe's prose.  His writing is spare,
> concise, and it grabs you with the ideas it presents rather than trying
> to enmesh you in purple language.  There is no color for the sake of
> color, no passages of filler description in sad and misguided emulation
> of JRRT or Peake.

   I find this opinion hard to believe.  I have tried to read a number of
books by Gene Wolfe at various times.  He is one of very few "acclaimed"
authors who I have found unreadable.  I cannot believe that anyone would
call his writing "spare".  The only description that I can think that is
vaguely appropriate is my old first form English teacher's worst comment
"verbal diarrhea".

   This certainly shows a massive difference in taste from the above
comments.

Stephen Harker
Monash University

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net