Gene Wolfe: Another New Sun question
Mark Andersen · 23 Jun 1994, 22:23
· from sf-lovers.1994.mbox
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: manderse at nmsu.edu (Mark Andersen) Subject: Re: Gene Wolfe: Another New Sun question Date: 23 Jun 94 22:23:40 GMT Message-ID: <sflovers-v19-516-2 at digest.sf-lovers> X-Digest-Issue: SF-LOVERS Digest V19 #516 X-Urthmirror-Source: https://archive.org/details/sf-lovers-digest-vol-19b curtw at euler.jsc.nasa.gov (Curt Wiederhoeft) writes: >SPOILERS HO! > >Now my question: Is Severian's interpretation correct? It seems to me >just as likely that with all of the time travel going on in the series, it >might just be the case that a dead Miles provided the raw materials for >Jonas' "patch job," and that Severian has it completely backwards. I think you're closer to being right than Severian is. In fact, this whole topic of time-travel effects in the _New Sun_ is something I've been thinking about a lot lately. At first, I thought that some of the time-travel effects were "closed loops" and some were "open", but now I'm beginning to think they're all "open". (I'm putting "open" and "closed" in quotes here because I don't want people to get the mistaken impression that I'm thinking of these things as equivalent to the "closed time-like loops" of wormhole theory. I'm also still trying to figure out why people abbreviate "closed time-like loops" as CTTL instead of CTLL; maybe I've just been seeing traditional propagation of a typo, I don't know.) Other examples: Ossipago, et al.; Gunnie and Burgundofara; The Claw of the Conciliator; Abaia's "girlfriend". All these characters (and artifact) are involved in timelines that move backward. I had another example in mind last night, but I was in the car and didn't write it down, so now, predictably, I've forgotten it. Maybe I should start carrying around a miniature tape recorder. Slightly off the main subject, but still relevant to discussions of Gene Wolfe: Has anybody out there read enough Proust to feel qualified to comment on Proust's influences on Wolfe's work? Want to contribute to the planned _New Sun_ FAQ? I can handle the Borges influences myself; and tracking down the Lewis influence will finally give me an excuse to read the _Perelandra_ trilogy (a.k.a _Space Trilogy_), but Proust has just never been within my literary mean free path. Comments and contributions _re_ other influences, particularly Nabokov, Faulkner, and Chesterton, are also welcome. Mark Andersen Department of Fishery and Wildlife Sciences New Mexico State University
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net