Wolfe's NEW SUN (was Rhialto the Marvellous - Jack Vance)
Mike Berro · 22 May 1998, 17:25
· from sf-lovers.1998.mbox
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: mikeb at massmedia.com (Mike Berro) Subject: Wolfe's NEW SUN (was Rhialto the Marvellous - Jack Vance) Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 17:25:25 GMT Message-ID: <sflovers-v23-106-7 at digest.sf-lovers> X-Digest-Issue: SF-LOVERS Digest V23 #106 X-Urthmirror-Source: https://archive.org/details/sf-lovers-digest-vol-23 aleistra at leland.Stanford.EDU (Andrea Lynn Leistra) wrote: >Advice: Never read the _Book of the New Sun_. It's an amazingly wonderful >piece of literature, but - gasp - you will not know all the words in it. >And neither will your dictionary, unless your dictionary is the OED. >(They *are* all real words, just very obscure ones). I am really upset that I did not like the New Sun books (I read the first four.) I was so sure that I would, based on the recommendations of people who like Vance, that I spent large sums on the first editions (a fetish of mine), giving me an even greater incentive. It just didn't do it for me. The writing was very good, enough to get me through the four books, but unlike Vance, who (in at least some of his novels) never makes a pretense of telling a grand story, I felt in the SUN books that there was a subplot (or twelve) that was kept hidden from me, and never resolved. Perhaps they are resolved in the sequels, but I don't enjoy being kept in the dark for so long. Perhaps I missed the resolution (although I did understand all of the words.) If I'm just imagining a subplot, then my opinion of the book is even worse. Overall, it seems a "portentious" book, with little resolution of the portents. With Vance, each chapter is a delight (even when he is describing tortures), so that the payoffs are almost immediate. Mike Berro
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net