gene wolfe and cyberpunk

Maru Dubshinki · 16 Jun 2005, 21:27 · from 2005-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marudubshinki at gmail.com (Maru Dubshinki)
Date: Thu Jun 16 21:27:29 2005
Subject: (urth) gene wolfe and cyberpunk
In-Reply-To: <42B23AB7.1020001 at pressroom.com>
References: <20050613191003.8507684DBC at che.dreamhost.com>
	<6.2.1.2.0.20050616090253.04231eb0 at pop.vippn.com>
	<42B23AB7.1020001 at pressroom.com>
Message-ID: <f5238c305061621271b7c0e1e at mail.gmail.com>

Well, there you go: he has lapsed into anime vocabularly, so don't feel bad.

In case you were wondering, GitS was discussed earlier- it is "Ghost
in the Shell".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_shell

AS stands for the popular programming segment Cartoon Network airs
late at night, called "Adult Swim".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_Swim
(The name comes form the fact that at night, the kids aren't watching
so they can show more mature 'adult' stuff- kinda like a pool. Get it,
adult swim=... ah never mind.)

~Maru
On a very side note, I'm surpised you don't like bottom-posting- every
forum Usenet or otherwise, has told me to bottom post, and definitely
not top- but you seem to prefer top, so I shall.

On 6/16/05, David Kirby <dbkirby at pressroom.com> wrote:
> Okay, the abbreviation "DADoES" is probably familiar enough to SF fans,
> even without my inclusion above of the improbably capitalized "do
> androids dream of electric sheep."
> 
> But "GitS"? "AS"? I have no idea what you're talking about here.
> (That statement may pin me as an ol' fogey -- the first time I've
> been so pinned -- but I suspect many written SF contributors will
> agree with its sentiment.) These may have been explained earlier
> in the thread, but they aren't explained in this message, and they
> should have been. One of the advantages of Usenet or mailing lists
> is that a reader or participant doesn't have to know *everything*
> that has gone before in order to participate. (Most Web-based
> discussion forums I've seen don't have or don't encourage a
> ["here's what I had to say" --> "here's what you respond"] format.)
> 
> (Top-posting is also appreciated, if appropriate, although
> "interleaved" posting is perfectly accepted when appropriate.
> Bottom-posting is not appreciated and indicates, at least to
> me, that you've not read carefully the post you're responding
> to.)
> 
> Can we, please, try to be a bit more inclusive in future
> messages?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>        -- David

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net