Severian's skin color
James Wynn · 23 Jun 2005, 15:02
· from 2005-June.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: thewynns at earthlink.net (James Wynn) Date: Thu Jun 23 15:02:38 2005 Subject: (urth) Severian's skin color Message-ID: <20402465.1119564156555.JavaMail.root at wamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Crush said: >>Thematically, I consider it very important. Tussah=Typhon means that >>Tussah;s and Pas's murder that happened at about the same are >>connected so far as the story goes. Much has been made of Pas's >>possible intentions for Silk. It shows that Pas' original plan did not >>include Silk. Silk came later, after things went awry. If Silk is >>genetically >>Horn's son, then the fact that the Rajan is simultaneously Silk, Horn, and >>Horn the Neighbor builds on the theme of rationalizing the Holy Trinity >>which Wolfe takes at many levels in The Short Sun. >This is the kind of thing I was talking about, and I do think there's a very >big thematic problem here. You are suggesting that Wolfe is "rationalizing" >the Holy Trinity by deriving it from Typhon, who is on several levels *the >Demiurge*. Perhaps you can justify this, I don't know, but any attempt to >work this into the theme changes the implications of the entire series from >top to bottom - and, as far as I can tell, not for the better. It seems like >you'd be left with nothing but a sort of Gnostic pamphlet piece. >This isn't the only way the clone angle can be explored, of course, but it >seems like many of the Clone Interpretations that have been proposed tend to >center the theme on this one aspect at the direct cost of turning other >aspects into mere farce, or simply discounting them. I don't care if you completely deny there are *any* clones in the entire Sun Cycle, it is still extremely arguable (but I'm not arguing it) that the books are to Gnosticsm what The Chronicles of Narnia are to Orthodox Christianity. That's just a fact, and discounting clones doesn't solve it. You still have a Gnostic pamphlet. Severian is named after a 2nd century Gnostic sect. Silk is an "enlightened" man who becomes divine. Pas is an evil maker of an evil world who is undermined by the original "good god" from outside it. I would really like get Wolfe to provide a definitive answer on this. But that is totally aside from Wolfe's rationalization of the Trinity....which he does for example in his discussion regarding Thyone's Son in RTTW... he is showing through the Rajan that it is possible...theoretically...for a person to be three persons yet one person. He's not saying that's how God *is*. He's only showing that it is not unreasonable. Wolfe has said that originally The Long Sun was about a "good man in a bad religion". Perhaps Wolfe is showing that you can't savage the knowledge of the true God so much that he can't reach people's hearts. That, as they say, when you get far enough away you are on your way back home. A demon who imitates a god will be transformed into that god. So the more evil Pas is, the better he exemplifies Wolfe point. He's also clearly interested in mythical divine triads. Robert Graves made much of the female ones in "The White Goddess" (which Wolfe illustrates in the term "trivigaunte" and in the three sibyls) but there are plenty of important male triads as well in the mythologies of Greece, Scandinavia, Syria, etc. ~ Crush
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net