Shaving Clones
Chris · 25 Jun 2005, 16:48
· from 2005-June.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: rasputin_ at hotmail.com (Chris) Date: Sat Jun 25 16:48:25 2005 Subject: (urth) Shaving Clones In-Reply-To: <32667385.1119658752837.JavaMail.root at wamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Message-ID: <BAY102-F178DB72C9256F4CEF7E09386EC0 at phx.gbl> I do recognize that this plays on the biggest weakness of an attempted clone theory, but then in a broader sense almost any constructive theory of this kind from Wolfe's work has problems with "economy". Wolfe does not make it easy to draw clean, economical interpretations of his stories (which is not to say we shouldn't still *try* to be economical in our interpretations). That said I would just take it as implicit that a theory like this faces an uphill battle, and needs fairly strong arguments to be convincing, and leave it at that. Crush said: > >I don't think it's unworkable, I just think it's significantly awkward. > >Yes, but you find it awkward because (I find this stunning) you >found nothing particularly suspicious about Tussah's declaration >that Silk was somehow his "son". I found the statement absurd. This strays from my original point as far as the Wolfe quotation goes: if we take it as granted that Wolfe was speaking figuratively, then the quotation doesn't really provide usable evidence for any theory, yours or otherwise. Yes, I can see how you could read it the way you do, but I can also see how it can be read in other ways *even if your theory were correct*. But you are correct in that I don't find it unreasonable for Tussah to consider his chosen heir, who he has taken extraordinary effort to set up and protect, as his "son" in a sense. It's just that this isn't my reason for finding your reading awkward. I find it awkward because referring to Typhon as "Calde" in a context where the term is sure to be taken as referring to someone else flouts basic conversational rules - which is obvious, and we agreed on from the beginning. And no, I don't take the awkwardness to be decisive in ruling out your reading, because it's not beyond Wolfe. I just don't see any possibility of a decisive interpretation of that statement either way. >And why go out of your way to have an embryo succeed you? It has been too long since I read the Long Sun series to try to psychoanalyze Tussah, and I doubt there's enough in the text to allow that anyway, but possibly because he wanted an especially effective leader to follow him? Because he cared for the people under his rule? Or possibly as a final gesture of his own power beyond death, in choosing and maneuvering the person who would carry on after him? (I would have to dig, but I seem to recall Machiavelli putting a similar sentiment in the mouth of some historical ruler or other). Maybe out of pure spite for his political enemies, wanting to be sure his successor would be strong enough to defeat/destroy them. >And how did he know that Silk would become Calde'? After all, >with his leadership skills, he might have ascended to the >Ayuntamiento or succeded Quetzal? This leads to an odd bit of speculation which I don't know whether there's any solid evidence to be found, but... I seem to recall there is something very odd towards the beginning of the Long Sun series, where someone has put up a huge graffiti to the effect of "Silk for Calde!" long before Silk is well-known or has done anything to attract public attention to himself. It always seemed quite out of place. It seemed to me that someone, before the story even begins, is preparing to maneuver Silk into taking over, and it is a mystery as to who's behind it. Possibly agents secretly loyal to Tussah who were left to watch Silk and push him into leadership when the time came? >And since Silk's embryo came from the Whorl, how did his >second set of parents get in the Mainframe? > >As I said, I didn't go trying to figure out how to get clones on Whorl. >As I saw it, Wolfe left no other explanation. All of the original Whorl colonists, including the ones in stasis, originally came from Urth. Perhaps a couple of them were Silk's parents? It wouldn't require that much of a stretch. As an aside, Mainframe is a concept that always struck me as odd, and I just don't see how it can possibly work as presented (or why its designer would want to set it up that way). Which possibly points to some further secret about the nature of Mainframe, but if so I haven't been able to place it. > >Tussah was in charge of one city, among how many? Hundreds? I don't > >think this provides any special reason to believe that Tussah is a clone >of > >Typhon. > >I did not say this as proof that Tussah was a clone of Typhon. I was >responding to your assertion that Pas would prefer a clone of himself >to lead the colonists rather than a clone of his son. I was agreeing with >you. Well, backing up from the question of Typhon's preferences for a second: in the broadest terms, either Tussah's being a clone of Typhon was an intended part of the plan for evacuating the ship, or it was not. If it was part of the plan, then this suggests that the same thing would be true in the other cities as well, implying lots of clones brought into play (though I am not sure how that would work in a matriarchal city, for example). If it was not part of the plan, then Tussah's being a clone of Typhon ends up being incidental, and we are left with a big question of how/why this came about that has no good answer. >But the embryos *were* sent on the Whorl with the very intent that they >would >use their predispositions for leadership to make the colonies successful. >That >is stated explicitly. We know that. Right. And this to me falls into a category of planning that is something like: "give them good starting materials, and hope for the best." And that does seem to be the way Typhon operated. What I don't see happening, though, is a sort of micro-manipulation where Pas, from the beginning of the voyage, says: "At time X I want a person with THIS set of genes in THIS particular position." But this is just another way of working on the angle that either having a clone (Tussah) in place at that time is intentional, or it is not. If it's intentional, it really stretches the bounds of what we can reasonably expect Pas to have planned, even if he made the plan on the spot just before decanting the clone. And this also does not seem to be a sensible or workable way to plan things. >Okay. For the record, we've moved off of Tussah and on to Horn. > >First of all, it was only a guess. Secondly, Horn was about 15. That makes >his birth a good deal less than 10 years after Tussah's murder. Tussah, I >presume, knew who was his "son not of his body". Everyone guessed he >was already out there somewhere. It did't require special knowledge of >their future at all. Well, OK, here I should ask: if Horn was also a decanted embryo, do you think his being present at the same manteion where Silk would eventually end up was intended, or mere coincidence? If coincidence, what would be the purpose of taking an exhorbitantly expensively embryo and dropping him into a poor family, in a location where he is unlikely to get a great education and where statistically he stands a greater chance of being killed in some random accident or crime before reaching a reasonable age? If he's meant to play some role, or be a backup, why not decant him earlier so that he could be a more reasonable age when the time came? On the other hand if he was meant to be there under the tutelage of Silk, whoever put him there would have to have an unrealistically exact sense of what was going to happen and when. >THe text says that embryos had to be procured from the black market. They >weren't easy to get. Why would you assume the person who did it could time >it? I'm not certain any living person knew that Silk was the "son" or >whether >the son had died of measles at 10. I agree, and this goes right along with what I was trying to get at. It makes Horn's presence at that place and time even more inexplicable. > >Lots of people in New Viron knew Horn first hand. And they get to see >Silk's > >body when Silkhorn returns to New Viron. I do not think Silk was so old >that > >a family resemblance would have been that impossible to discern. >Especially > >in a family that striking. > >Come on! You're telling me that anyone would recognize you as your father's >son >without the two of you compare side by side, even if one of your was >paunchy >and balding and the other was rail-thin, had long white hair, and a missing >eye? For the average person, perhaps not (but realistically, maybe). But we're supposedly talking about someone for whom facial features are extremely important, this is what I was getting at. If the "face of command" is genetically passed on, then someone who actually has it will have certain distinctive features, won't they? And if Horn didn't get the features, then he wouldn't have had the face and uncanny leadership skills you assume him to have. Though for the record I do not think Horn had any particularly uncanny leadership skills other than having learned from a good teacher - but then again, I don't think Horn is a clone either.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net