Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Wolfe's women

m.driussi · 19 Jun 1997, 21:13 · from urth-v0002.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: m.driussi at genie.com
Subject: (urth) Wolfe's women
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 97 21:13:00 GMT
Message-ID: <urth-v0002-0102 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0002/0102.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


[Posted from URTH, a mailing list about Gene Wolfe's New Sun and other work=
s]

Reply:  Item #2682162 from URTH at LISTS.BEST.COM@INET01#

Cephalothorax,

Well obviously I'm at a loss if you decline to answer my specific
questions (about men and women) regarding your generalizations (about
women).  So we'll just drop it.

Re: Blackness. I'm not going to say anymore than point out that your
assertion "he [Wolfe] never seems to mention ethnicity unless a
character is `Black'" conflicts with my tracking of "Celtic"
ethnicity within Wolfe's work.  Same books, different readers: The
End.

Re: William Burroughs, yes, one of his great strengths is that his
savage satire (campy/vampy/grotesque) is rigorously equal opportunity--
to the point that I'm somewhat surprised that nobody has every used his
texts as a blistering damnation of homosexuality.  Not exactly "gay
pride," that fellow Bill's books.

=3Dmantis=3D





An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net