Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Ascians' Thematic Purppose (was ATTENDING DAEDALUS)

Adam Thornton · 30 Jan 2006, 19:32 · from 2006-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: adam at io.com (Adam Thornton)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:32:15 -0600
Subject: (urth) Ascians' Thematic Purppose (was ATTENDING DAEDALUS)
In-Reply-To: <1f7617370601301117o2d35665em2957c4a13d0cfa18 at mail.gmail.com>
References: <BAY103-F248D79EC85F010E18C224B88090 at phx.gbl>
	<011301c625a7$3d18a7f0$0301a8c0 at wdw.disney.com>
	<1f7617370601301117o2d35665em2957c4a13d0cfa18 at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2CD9CF0B-8366-4164-B007-52A603156C1F at io.com>


On Jan 30, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:

>  It becomes necessary to create a new
> level of grammar where, rather than fitting words together
> to form sentences, preset sentences are fitted together
> to form ... I don't know what you'd call them, because
> the significance of each sentence is allowed to vary
> hugely with its context, in two senses: the circumstances
> of utterance and the preceding/following sentences.
> What Wolfe has done, albeit sketchily, is proposed a
> working language where no signifier has a well-defined
> signified. Really astonishing stuff.

There's something else that everyone misses about the storytelling  
contest.

As Wolfe loves to do, we get the story through various layers of  
intermediaries.  We do not get the Ascian's story as such.  Or  
rather, we do, but we get it presented with a commentary that turns  
it from a string of Correct Thought phrases into a coherent narrative.

Why should we believe that Foila is both knowledgeable and  
trustworthy?  We really have no way of knowing either the story Foila  
interprets for the Ascian is the story he meant to tell, and if it  
isn't, we don't have any way of knowing whether Foila was unable to  
interpret his story correctly or whether she received one story and  
told another.

Adam

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net