The Piteous Gate (was: Book of the new sun (1-4) questions)

Chris · 21 Feb 2006, 22:02 · from 2006-February.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: rasputin_ at hotmail.com (Chris)
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:02:07 +0000
Subject: (urth) The Piteous Gate (was: Book of the new sun (1-4)
	questions)
In-Reply-To: <19065094.1140551745075.JavaMail.root at elwamui-milano.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Message-ID: <BAY102-F280C34A824159C894470386FC0 at phx.gbl>

The road is officially devoted to military use, the transportation of troops 
and supplies, so that is what the gate is for.

I find all arguments about what happened at the Piteous Gate to be a bit 
tenuous, but here are a couple things which make a certain amount of common 
sense to me at any rate.

Even if the uhlans are authorized to plunder anyone on the road, it would 
probably not be profitable for them to do so (because then nobody would ever 
use the road). The profitable way to approach it is to leave people alone 
for the most part and not enforce the rule - this also happens to be good 
for the economy - which would encourage people to go ahead and use the road, 
even if they are aware that there is some small risk involved. Then, every 
once in a while, you come down and enforce it; and when you do so, you will 
end up with a huge haul rather than a couple stray travellers here and 
there.

>Duncan wrote:
> >>1: what happened at the piteous gate? there was a riot,
> >>there were clone soldiers...?
> >
>Tony wrote:
> >The explanation for this has cropped up a few times in the list,
> >actually, but since it's my explanation I'm happy to repeat it. :-)
> >
> >The soldiers are driving people off the road, because it's illegal to
> >use the roads of commonwealth.
>
>I find this explanation a bit odd. Why have a gate if no one is allowed to 
>use the road to pass through it?
>
>Rob
>_______________________________________________
>Urth Mailing List
>To post, write urth at urth.net
>Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net