Christian relativity

don doggett · 11 Apr 2006, 22:20 · from 2006-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: kingwukong at yahoo.com (don doggett)
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: (urth) Christian relativity
In-Reply-To: <1f7617370604111332vec7b388n90a7c784aae974c6 at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20060411222027.62485.qmail at web32405.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

--- Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com> wrote:

> On the other hand, I appreciate the physics neepery.
> Perhaps
> it can be marked with a different Subject: so people
> who don't
> want to read it can skip it without missing the rest
> of the
> discussion?

I doubt that's necessary. Information like that just
looks like big blocks of code to me anyway and my
brain just glides across it until something sticks.
Sometimes that something happens to be the delete
button. Other times I actually learn something. (dear
god no). I just think physics citations are hardly a
requirement for a valid literary argument. They're
more like cookies. Made of tofu. And Carob. A treat.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net