Information, etc.
Iorwerth Thomas · 14 Apr 2006, 20:44
· from 2006-April.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: iorweththomas at hotmail.com (Iorwerth Thomas) Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:44:25 +0100 Subject: (urth) Information, etc. In-Reply-To: <1f7617370604111516k2335ba48jb4df6bdaf33993eb at mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <BAY102-F41E9105E4422F3FF1EC395B9C00 at phx.gbl> >From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <danldo at gmail.com> >On 4/11/06, Chris <rasputin_ at hotmail.com> wrote: > > The religiously dangerous course to take is to say that God > > *can't* violate the laws of nature, and some have taken it. The > > course that has seemed safer to others is to say that God can, > > but *won't*, violate the laws of nature for whatever reason - usually > > because of his benevolence towards us, sometimes because of > > his rationality, etc. > >Actually, this is (from the Catholic perspective) quite a dangerous >course also, in that it denies miracles, and the Christian (and so >Catholic, and, I presume, Wolfe's) faith is _based_ on miracles, >from the Virgin Birth to the Resurrection, not to exclude (at least >for Catholics) ongoing miracles such as the limited infallibility of >Popes and the transubstantiation of the Host in the Eucharist. Depends on what value one assigns 'miracle', I guess. (But as a wicked Anglican, and hence neither truely Catholic nor Protestant, I _would_ say that. :) ) Siding with Wittgenstein here also. Does this count as a form of argumentum ad populum?
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net