Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Eyes of Thecla

mournings glory · 06 May 2006, 03:39 · from 2006-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: mourningsglory at hotmail.com (mournings glory)
Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 03:39:32 +0000
Subject: (urth) Eyes of Thecla
In-Reply-To: <d046a0310605051932h3d6c241bj301f77051032548e at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BAY107-F1154A3E2BC72DC46A0F357D8AA0 at phx.gbl>


>From: "Rex Racer" <rex.racerx at gmail.com>
>
>Actually, forebearance with an e is an acceptable variant of forbearance, 
>so
>it is not even a typo or editorial error. I actually would use it a lot in 
>a
>former life writing letters that required such serious precise verbiage

But you will allow that forebearance can also mean pertaining to one's 
forebears, right? And while you may be correct about the usage of 
forebearance for forbearance in the personal correspondence of yesteryear, 
you will not find the variant spelling listed anywhere at all in Wolfe's 
beloved dictionary of choice, the O.E.D. -- which seems curious to me since 
it generally lists all known variants, even when obsolete or rare. 
Forbearance, on the other hand, appears 27 times and as early as 1593, in 
Shakespeare's Henry VI. Might you therefor (a pertinent OED variant, no?) 
have an alternate reputable source for your claim?

M



An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net