Wiki draft proposal
maru dubshinki · 09 May 2006, 19:38
· from 2006-May.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: marudubshinki at gmail.com (maru dubshinki) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 15:38:16 -0400 Subject: (urth) Wiki draft proposal Message-ID: <f5238c30605091238p390c67c0y10b8f3190884070d at mail.gmail.com> I've been thinking about this for a while, and I think any wiki we start on Wolfe's work should be categorized tripartitely: One section should be for Urth ML emails. This would make it much easier to reference assertions and theories, especially since it seems that a number of messages are primary sources, not merely secondary sources. And of course, if they are hosted on the wiki itself, one could run a bot or some sort of bot to auto-link phrases to their pages. (Now that I think of it, one could compile a list of words, phrases, and subjects from the mass of texts). I'm not too sure about the copyright status, however: I'm pretty sure the list owner can allow them to be posted on a wiki (since he already has the right to so post them in a publicly accessible archive), but I don't know how that factors into reditributions and licensing. So having a separate section would allow us to segregate non-Free content from the Free content. The second section would be articles. Straightforward factual articles on Wolfe, relevant authors, his books and short stories, etc. Think like what Wikipedia currently has. I guess we could import Wikipedia policies wholesale for this section: verifiable, NPOV, no personal attacks, etc. This section we could grab straight from Wikipedia. About all we'd have to do is add a GFDL notice (assuming we decide to go with a non-GFDL license, or cross-license) and perhaps swap out internal Wikipedia links for interwiki links. Of course, these articles would link (perhaps in the relevant sections) to the third section... which is the section of interest to us all: The third section would be distilled discussions and theories. The idea is to condense all the verbiage and back and forth into a single page of pros and cons (ie. the evidence that, say, Thecla is the hermaphrodite lover of the Autarch would be presented on its own page, perhaps titled "Theclas as hermaphrodite"; the evidence for it would be presented, linking to the relevant emails, with textual citations and such, and then the opposed side. Talk pages can be used to hammer out the list, or it can be done on-list.) Categories could be very useful for sections two and three. An off-the-cuff example: A top-level category could be Authors, with Gene Wolfe in it, and then Books and Short Stories in the Wolfe cat, books being divided into Short Sun, New Sun, Peace, Soldier etc. categories. Then one has the articles on the individual novels. If a character appears in all the books, and so doesn't fit into a single book's category, they would go in the New Sun category, but minor characters could go into only one book's category (ie. Triskele would go into the New Sun cat, but the serving boy at the restaurant in SotT would be in the Shadow of the Torturer cat (if that's the right book)). Now, no doubt someone will suggest that the wiki host the various Wolfe interviews and miscellany available online. I won't address these: technically those are copyright violations (at least, I haven't seen any under any sort of Free license), and so it would be unconscionable for me to advise Ranjit to set up a wiki and work to populate it with stuff that exposes him, the hoster, to legal retribution. Now, perhaps he doesn't mind the risk, or perhaps Wolfe has made known an intention not to prosecute any fans, but it's up to Ranjit, not me, or us, for that matter. We also need a name. Lupinepedia, Wolfepedia, the Wolfe Wiki, the urth Wiki, just plain Urth.net... are all possible names. Now, the perfect name would be short, clever, clear, and be easily compressed (ie names based on Urth or Wolfe are good, as they make it easy to refer to, and they also make interwiki links from, say, Wikipedia, easy to do, so they look like [[w:c:Wolfe:Article|Article]] or [[Urth:Article|Article]] instead of something much longer). Just some thoughts. We also need to decide on licensing. Using the GFDL is a possibility but there are severe drawbacks that may more than counterwiegh the ease of using Wikipedia articles as a base: it's long, complex, cumbersome, unclear, and there are some bad features. I'll provide some links for further reading, if you want to know more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Free_Documentation_License#Criticisms_of_the_GFDL http://wikitravel.org/en/Wikitravel:Why_Wikitravel_isn%27t_GFDL http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml There are quite a few possibilities w/r/t Free license. We could use a modified BSD license (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_license), a Creative Commons license (I like the Attribution-SA myself: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/), or a public domain license (no rights reserved, essentially). My personal preference would be to go with PD; it's simple, it's definitely Free, and it's not like we really need the protections of copyleft- who'll steal our content? And of course, if we decide to merge with Wikipedia some day, PD interoperates well with GFDL. Ok. So those are my thoughts on the subject. Look forward to hearing your comments and criticism. ~maru "A beginning is the time for taking the most delicate care that the balances are correct."
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net