Urth Net

← back to the conversation

golden Severa etc.

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 17 May 2006, 17:20 · from 2006-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:20:29 -0700
Subject: (urth) golden Severa etc.
In-Reply-To: <10605170750.AA12167 at slack.com>
References: <10605170750.AA12167 at slack.com>
Message-ID: <1f7617370605171020h68f552bdyd50eecaed1ba9fb8 at mail.gmail.com>

On 5/17/06, David DiGiacomo <david at slack.com> wrote:
> >>>Pedophiles are often attracted to children because of their perceived
> >>>innocence.
> >>
> >> I know this is not really relevant to Wolfe, but... this assertion just
> >> has me floored.  Where did this idea come from?  How could anyone possibly
> >> know?  What does "often" mean?
> >
> >Pedophilia has been studied and profiled the same way most criminal
> >pathologies have been. "Often" here means a behavior shared by a
> >significant portion of the group studied.
>
> Yes, but this statement is about motivation, not behavior.
>
> As I said, how could anyone know?
>
> What external evidence could possibly validate the assertion?
>
> If a pedophile described his motivation, even if you believed he was
> honest, what use would it be?  Introspection can't explain biology.

Where to begin ...

First of all, pedophilia, unlike gayosity, does _not_ appear to be
significantly biological in origin. (Twin studies, etc.)

Second, you seem to be taking an extreme behaviorist position,
which I think is pretty much outmoded.

Third ... it is certainly possible to study the type of children
more victimized by pedophiles and create an "ideal victim"
profile that exemplifies the characteristics a pedophile seeks
in a child. And, while "innocence" is not an observable
characteristic, certain physical, social, and behavioral
features that tend to be perceived as "innocence" _are_.
Some of these are simply typical of children; others,
such as mode of dress, manner of speech, reaction to
strangers, etc., vary greatly from child to child.

If -- and I have _not_ studied work on pedophilia, so I am
speculating here -- such characteristics proved to be
particularly attractive to pedophiles then it woudl be
reasonable to say that "Pedophiles are often attracted to
children because of their perceived innocence."

Note that in no way am I asserting that the original
statement is "true." I'm merely pointing out that "how could
anyone know" has a meaningful answer, though I have no
personal knowledge of whether the methodology I sketch
has in fact been followed.

--Dan'l

-- 
I do not fear Satan half so much as I fear those who fear him.
                        -- St Teresa of Avila
http://www.livejournal.com/users/sturgeonslawyer

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net