giant fluids
Transentient · 20 May 2006, 19:23
· from 2006-May.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: transentient at gmail.com (Transentient) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 15:23:17 -0400 Subject: (urth) giant fluids In-Reply-To: <200605201405.35591.ddjones at riddlemaster.org> References: <BAY103-F110603012F926BD8446872D7A70 at phx.gbl> <200605191824.22442.ddjones at riddlemaster.org> <B7D517BD-B73E-4A9A-A7AD-5E3A7B7AB3EB at gmail.com> <200605201405.35591.ddjones at riddlemaster.org> Message-ID: <390521C2-54E0-4EE4-B89D-582A0CE63F9F at gmail.com> >>> "Disrobed, I will love it as if it were a dwarfish man. I will >>> draw staring >>> eyes and a smiling mouth. I will anoint it with sweet oils, cozen >>> and kiss >>> it, beg its love.... Erupting it will bathe me in semen, and I will >>> praise >>> and kiss the more, saying how happy it has made me and begging it >>> not to go." >> >> What I find most disturbing here is that this wouldn't result in >> impregnation, unless the giant's semen behaved similarly to the >> giant's blood. >> >> And I dearly wish I hadn't ever realized that... > > Not exactly dinner table conversation, is it? However, considering > the > copious amount of semen that would be produced and the fact that > the female > is disrobed, I think it quite likely that a sperm could, ah, find > it's way to > the appropriate location to cause conception. I'm reasonably > certain that > there have been cases of pregnancy documented where no penetration > occurred. I appreciate the effort, but its like that bedroom closet door in the first Poltergeist movie that I saw when I was way too young - nothing is going to make me "unimagine" this bit of horror. :) Giant's blood is noted to be inhabited by numerous small loathesome creatures. I get the impression that this fauna is not OF the giant, but are more like parasites or symbiots of some kind. The giant's vital fluid is simply a microcosm of life. But (correct me if I am misremembering), but the giants themselves rose from hacked-up bits of Angr herself originally, right? A bit of John Carpenter's visualization of The Thing going on here. So which is it - is the blood of the Angrborn animated itself, is it inhabited by species of critter that are basically small organisms of the same flesh as the giant, similar to how the Angrborn themselves are remnants of Angr, or are the organisms that dwell in the blood of a giant some external species? Any thoughts? In "The Legend of Xi Cygnus" from Innocents Aboard, which features a giant much like the Angrborn, they are described as "those small creatures that dwell in the blood." It seems more like these are parasites or symbiots - they aren't PART of the giant, they just live in his veins. I am not sure how much connection between this short and Wizard Knight I should read into it, but in the short story, I was left with the idea that the giant, the king, was symbolic of the Earth. And the dwarves were the human race, and the last line of the story was a rejoinder to be gentle on her old bones. (Well, the giant could be other things, too, that the human race has abused and defiled at its own peril.) But at any rate - should the semen of a giant be similarly inhabited by squirming wriggling things that would be active participants in the consumation of a marriage between a giant and a human female, I wonder if they are actually OF the giant or merely creatures that live there in his um...
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net