Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Hierodules and time

thalassocrat at nym.hush.com · 26 May 2006, 13:14 · from 2006-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: thalassocrat at nym.hush.com (thalassocrat at nym.hush.com)
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 23:14:26 +1000
Subject: (urth) Hierodules and time
Message-ID: <20060526131426.9B5FADA821 at mailserver8.hushmail.com>



On Fri, 26 May 2006 22:50:58 +1000 b sharp 
<bsharporflat at hotmail.com> wrote:
>Thalassocrat I think it is simpler than all that.  F, B and O move 

>only 
>backward in time, virtually without exception (which marks them as 

>pawns, in 
>Tzadkiel's chess analogy).
>
>Their first meeting with Severian is on Tzadkiel's ship.  They go 
>back in 
>time to meet him as Autarch a number of times, they go back to 
>meet him in 
>Baldander's castle, then go back to watch him in Eschatology and 
>Genesis, 
>then go back to find him as Apu Punchau.  They (F and B anyway) 
>know the 
>least on Tzadkiel's ship and they know the most in Apu Punchau's 
>time.

No, it doesn't work like that. As I pointed out, they know about 
the E&G incident at the time they meet Sev at Baldanders' castle. 
Sword Ch33, Barbatus to Dr Talos: "We could have killed your 
creator easily enough that night, as you know. We burned him only 
enough to turn aside his charges." And as I also pointed out, at 
this stage they know *both* the past (this incident) and the future 
(dealings with Sev when he is Autarch). Any solution to the 
conundrum isn't going to be simple.

>I take this to mean, in our current context,  that if Wolfe didn't 

>use a 
>"deus ex machina" storyteller's trick (Ossipago's role) then he 
>would have 
>had to leave out the "backwards in time" nature of Hierodules.  
>And the 
>story would have been worse. And he is, first and foremost, a 
>storyteller.

I really don't see the relevance of the well-known Roger Rabbit 
quote to the Hierodule/time issue, sorry, and I can't really see 
the putative role of Ossipago as a "deus ex machina" device, as the 
term is usually understood. 

>
>There is a reference to using "deus ex machina" (he only alludes 
>to this 
>phrase) tricks in the text of BotNS.  Something like:  "only the 
>worst 
>playwrights use them, but it is better to use them than have the 
>play end 
>badly".  I've been looking for it but for the life of me I can't 
>find it 
>again.  Help somebody! Roy? Anybody!!!!

It's aquastor-Malrubius to Sev, at the end of botNS.


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net