Shapeshifting Evidence and Principles
thalassocrat at nym.hush.com · 29 May 2006, 01:05
· from 2006-May.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: thalassocrat at nym.hush.com (thalassocrat at nym.hush.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 11:05:45 +1000 Subject: (urth) Shapeshifting Evidence and Principles Message-ID: <20060529010546.423C433C23 at mailserver5.hushmail.com> I wrote: >I don't think that's the real dichotomy. Better: "Here's a nice >shiny jewel - let's shove it in the ring!" vs "But it doesn't fit, > >and if you scratch it, it flakes. Let's find a real gem that >fits." Well, that certainly sounds more aggressive than I intended. I really meant that everybody finds themselves on different sides of that division from time to time. What looks like ill-fitting tawdry costume paste to some may look like the Wossisname diamond to others, or even to the same person at a different time. Etc etc etc. I don't think anybody really denies the existence of empty jewel settings which we're supposed to fill in for ourselves.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net