Wolfe, Dollo and Evolution

Robert Borski · 05 Jun 1998, 17:34 · from urth-v0013.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Robert Borski" <rborski at coredcs.com>
Subject: (urth) Wolfe, Dollo and Evolution
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 17:34:20
Message-ID: <urth-v0013-0002 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0013/0002.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

To Mark Millman:

Thank you for presenting the Lamarkian position, and nicely so at that--now
I don't have to do it.=20

I do think however some discussion of Dollo's Law needs to take place,
because it's crucial to an understanding of FIFTH HEAD in several senses.

I'm therefore enclosing my Dollo's Law entry from CAVE CANEM:

Dollo's Law: an actual tenet of evolutionary theory, formulated by the
Belgian biologist Louis Dollo (1857-1931), also known as the Law of
Irreversible Evolution. It basically states that organisms cannot re-evolve
along lost pathways, but must (because the same fortuitous train of
mutational events, being totally random, will never repeat) find alternate
routes. Whales, in other words, will never again walk on land with
re-evolved pelvic appendages that derive from the current remnant
structures that correspond in us to legs. They *might* however evolve
appendages that derive from other biological provenance--especially if
there were some pressure to do so, say, if the oceans began to dry up.
While various non-Darwinian theorists have attempted to use Dollo to
promote their cause, Dollo was simply seeking to explain convergence of
form in diverse species (e.g., icthyosaurs, dolphins, fish). Note, however,
Wolfe uses Dollo correctly.

VRT subsequently uses Dollo's Law to explain how he learns to use a pencil,
but it also plays an important role in decoding one of Number Five's dreams
(I, 42). In the dream, Number Five is imprisoned in a courtyard, the paving
stones of which are mortuary tablets featuring the names of his ancestors
(a church like this exists in Port-Mimizon and it is probably where most of
Number Five's family is buried), and with columns too narrowly spaced
together for him to squeeze through.There are words written on the columns,
but only one of them is discernable: carapace. As Wolfe makes sure to tell
us in V.R.T, Dollo's Law is based on the study of fossilized turtle
carapaces. Thus the dream combines elements of stasis, death and
unattainable goals; possibly also implying that the various Wolfe clones,
having forsaken their consciences, can never reacquire them.=20

Lupines interested in reading more about evolutionary theory might also
pick up any of Stephen Jay Gould's fine work, usually found in most
libraries. He does go down smoother, however, if you'd had at least some
biology beyond the high school level.

Hey, at least our version of Maitre isn't a creationist!

Robert Borski

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net