Old Urth vs. New Urth

Fred Kiesche · 03 Jul 2006, 22:33 · from 2006-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: godel2escher2bach at yahoo.com (Fred Kiesche)
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: (urth) Old Urth vs. New Urth
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1.1151958956.23756.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
Message-ID: <20060703223325.75670.qmail at web52002.mail.yahoo.com>

Greetings:

I have "Urth" in the origina four-volume set from
Timescape (Pocket Books, those were the days!). Is
there any reason to get the new Tor/Orb omnibus
editions? Text that was excised put back in? Corrected
errors? Etc.?

Thanks!

          Fred Kiesche (FPK3)

  My books are water; those of great geniuses are wine. Everybody drinks water. (Mark Twain, "Notebook")
Over 7,000 postings served! See The Eternal Golden Braid (http://theeternalgoldenbraid.blogspot.com/ ).

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net