Disingenous Gene

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 25 Jul 2006, 17:09 · from 2006-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:09:20 -0700
Subject: (urth) Disingenous Gene
In-Reply-To: <BAY103-F8EA0A2E68E92EBDA3DBD6D75A0 at phx.gbl>
References: <BAY103-F8EA0A2E68E92EBDA3DBD6D75A0 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <1f7617370607251009i520796dj6ff437defec7ea91 at mail.gmail.com>

On 7/25/06, b sharp <bsharporflat at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Is it just his evasive personality, which is thus reflected in both his
> writing and his speech? Or a deliberate attempt to make sure nobody can ever
> understand his stories?  Or..?

More than anything else, I think it's a matter of not wanting to give the
game away -- he has repeatedly claimed that everything we need to
know is there, and he doesn't want to tell the answers. I think he
sometimes takes this to frustrating levels: no, I don't believe he ever
actually _lies_, but I believe he sometimes responds in ways that ...
how shall I put it? ... use the truth in misleading ways.

Take the Kaballah thing. He never actually said he wasn't familiar
with it; he said he had used it for "some names and ideas." That
sounds dismissive ... but what does "some ideas" mean? Ideas can
be big or small; he can mean the idea of multiple universes or he
can mean the whole four-worlds, ten-sephiroth structure of the
Kabbalistic Tree of Life. Or anything in between, or outside that
range entirely.

Again, I refer you to the essay on Onomastics in _Castle of the
Otter_. Wolfe states plainly: A thing's name states what it is. I guess
that's my bottom line; he makes a firm rule like this, puts it in print,
and then ignores it _only_ for naming worlds? Seems unlikely to
me, at any rate.

--Dan'l

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, writer, trainer, bon vivant
-----
http://www.livejournal.com/users/sturgeonslawyer
"Shovels are essential to the fantasy genre.
However, they are primarily used by the authors rather than the
characters." -- Stephen R. Donaldson

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net