Top Posting Makes The Theoanthropos Cry

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 01 Sep 2006, 19:31 · from 2006-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:31:43 -0700
Subject: (urth) Top Posting Makes The Theoanthropos Cry
In-Reply-To: <83BEA3E8-ACC9-4D42-B2A6-3302586F3803 at gmail.com>
References: <44F1FF19.2000904 at io.com>
	<1f7617370608272203p3d604840hd2b6869e6548b148 at mail.gmail.com>
	<f5238c30608311707p53caa874k65e854efad5ebc86 at mail.gmail.com>
	<1f7617370608311737i22d5c8dfl3663dcaffe0ab407 at mail.gmail.com>
	<44F7C2FD.3090201 at charter.net>
	<1f7617370609010757l12e4703eq6dc6e7a339c813b2 at mail.gmail.com>
	<83BEA3E8-ACC9-4D42-B2A6-3302586F3803 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1f7617370609011231w39ff2062p2faf8ca8794ca62 at mail.gmail.com>

On 9/1/06, Transentient <transentient at gmail.com> wrote:
> Move to France. :) France has a language academy that officially
> decides what is and is not French. If a foreign word becomes overly
> popular, they come up with a Frencher word to replace it.

Yes, but they don't speak English very well there. My problem is
not a generic love of grammar for its own sake but a deep love
of the English language.

> English is as it is used, unfortunately, by any people who use it, no
> matter their level of education or sophistication.

This is undeniably true. Nor am I a complete grammar crank who
shudders at a split infinitive or a well-used dangling modifier. But
I think changes that weaken the language ought to be resisted, and
"author" as a verb weakens the language. I'm not going to give a
detailed explanation of why I think so -- this is still a list for discussing
the works of Gene Wolfe, last I looked, and not a grammarian's
alcove -- but I'll say that I can't imagine a case in which the shorter,
more direct "write" isn't better. "Never use two syllables when one
will do,"

Also: the Anglo-saxon word is almost always more powerful in
English than the Latinate. (Which is why I try not to refer to Wolfe,
or any other writer, as an "author.")

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, writer, trainer, bon vivant
-----
http://www.livejournal.com/users/sturgeonslawyer
http://www.danehyoakes.com
I've got a piece of braaaaain lodge in me heeead!!!

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net