Close Reading: Torturer Chapter I
JWillard · 04 Sep 2006, 11:28
· from 2006-September.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: aldenweer at charter.net (JWillard) Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 06:28:31 -0500 Subject: (urth) Close Reading: Torturer Chapter I Message-ID: <44FC0DDF.9090405 at charter.net> Maybe this is a dumb idea, but I thought today that it might be interesting to start a close-reading project, beginning at the beginning with Shadow of the Torturer. Anyone who's interested could join in. In a thread like this title, we could start to gather questions and observations (specific and general), for each chapter and inch our way forward. (A chapter every few days or every week wouldn't take too much time away from any other reading.) I know that I've reached a point of frustration: I keep wanting to gather what I have learned (think I've learned) from Wolfe's books, but find my thoughts are more and more scattered and that I have less and less time to just sit down and re-read each book from cover to cover on a regular basis. I wonder if going back to square one and bouncing ideas off of each other will yield something of worth. If you think this sounds like an invitation to navel-gazing, well ... I'd say our devotion to these particular works has already marked us all as navel-gazers. I reject any sentiment along the lines of: "That sentence is very important, but that other sentence doesn't mean anything. I just know!" As no one has delivered a comprehensive key to the Wolfe opus, I don't believe in trivial trivia, provided one can ask an interesting question or defend an interesting observation about it. So, in a nutshell, starting with Chapter I, everything you think is important about it: characters, events, onomastics, rarefied vocabulary choices, things, foods, Urth-specific names (mystes, asimi, etc.), the obvious, the not-so-obvious, nagging doubts/questions, wild speculations. I realize that things will be repeated: the idea is to gather them so that we're not constantly searching. So, to leap in: I find Drotte's line, "You must know that for certain simples to attain their highest virtues they must be pulled from the grave by moonlight," darker now, as Vodalus and crew are pulling a kind of simple from the grave by Lunelight. Did Wolfe pick saint names by language for a reason? Why Roche, and not the Latin form, which I come across often. Why the odd form for Vodalus? Where's Eata from? Are these clues? A reminder of why I walk through Wolfe like a minefield: description of Vodalus, "I could see him through the fog, very tall, slender..." Very tall of course implies something familiar upon first reading, not alien basketball player. Thea: "nearly as tall as ... Vodalus." Two dove metaphors: "Her voice was like a dove's call..." and "As if a dove had momentarily commanded an arctother ..." Why? Significance of the heart-shaped face? Is there anything odd about Hildegrin never having used a pistol? "and what power of Erebus's gives you the right to come here and do something like this?" Something interesting I found in the W2 awhile ago: According to some sources, Charon is the son of Erebus. Is Erebus somehow Severian's great-grandfather? Is this line a joke: Severian being the "power of Erebus"? A Vodalarius is a follower of Vodalus. What is Severian a follower of (figuratively or literally)? There are, if I recall, many saints named Severus. Is there a hidden Severus in BOTNS? W2 def. for Severian: Eccl. Hist. a One of a sect of Encratite Gnostics of the 2d century. b A follower of Severus, the Monophysite patriarch of Antioch of the 6th century, who taught that the body of Christ, prior to his resurrection, was subject to corruption. Suspicious sentence: "The knife had somehow fallen from the dead man's neck. Perhaps he had pulled it out in his agony." Whenever Severian uses a perhaps, or one of its relatives, I get nervous. What other purpose would the line have? Is this someone half-healed by Severian's presence? Something entirely different? "Of those values ... I accepted only one: loyalty to the guild." Used to think this was noble. Now wonder, programming? Who was dug up? On a whim, thinking the line "we'll have her out like a carrot" was somehow oddly specific, I googled 'carrot symbolism' and found a coat of arms: "Among the earliest people to bear the Carrot name were the Carrot family who lived in Cornwall. This name is derived from Welsh surname Caeriw, meaning dweller at the fort on the hill." http://www.houseofnames.com/xq/asp.fc/qx/carrot-family-crest.htm Worthless? I don't know. So this is a scattershot version of what I'm proposing, but there it is. Any takers?
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net