Urth Net

← back to the conversation

urth Digest, Vol 26, Issue 12

Kieran Mullen · 16 Oct 2006, 19:25 · from 2006-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: kieran at ou.edu (Kieran Mullen)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:25:17 -0500
Subject: (urth) urth Digest, Vol 26, Issue 12
References: <mailman.78679.1161018924.570.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
Message-ID: <3B2AB615-41AD-4B46-B31A-485515ED6B37 at ou.edu>

>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:00:27 -0400
> From: Daniel D Jones <ddjones at riddlemaster.org>
> Subject: Re: (urth) The Death of Doctor Island Movie
> To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Message-ID: <200610161300.28204.ddjones at riddlemaster.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Monday 16 October 2006 12:55, David DiGiacomo wrote:
>>> I always thought that the trio of IDD, DrOfDI, and DofDrI was the  
>>> most
>>> accessible and visual of GWs works and would make an facinating  
>>> triptych
>>> of short films. Hopefully this will not be awful and they'll make  
>>> two
>>> more.
>>
>> I agree that The Death of Doctor Island is accessible in terms of
>> understanding the plot, but I also find it to be one of Wolfe's most
>> disturbing and offensive stories.  I can't imagine what a mass  
>> audience
>> would make of it.
>
> Care to expound on why you find it offensive?
>


I am not David, but I can write why I find the story disturbing:  an  
innocent young girl is brutally murdered in order to salvage one  
mentally disturbed adult male,  drive an innocent boy catatonic,  and  
manifest the more useful subdominant personality in the boy.   This  
is all based on some utilitarian calculus:  the low probability that  
the girl will be cured, the preference for the subdominant  
personality in the boy, the chance that the man will be cured.   It's  
the cold sacrifice of one life to improve another's life.    But I  
think that's the type of death offered by Doctor Island, and this is  
the point of the story.

What if the Island is wrong in its prognosis?    Is that much worse  
than its being right?

I'm not sure I'd call that offensive, but it is disturbing to me.

Kieran Mullen


P.S.  It's been a while since I read the story.




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net