Wolfe: Misogynist? and accessibility

Stanislaus · 19 Oct 2006, 17:35 · from 2006-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: sbocian at poczta.fm (Stanislaus)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:35:57 +0200
Subject: (urth) Wolfe: Misogynist? and accessibility
In-Reply-To: <453706F6.6060104 at io.com>
References: <19ee41770610181620g71479d40m526bc46af9b67379 at mail.gmail.com>
	<453706F6.6060104 at io.com>
Message-ID: <678808681.20061019193557 at poczta.fm>

Hello Jeff,

Thursday, October 19, 2006, 7:02:46 AM, you wrote:

> Jack Redelfs wrote:
>> I just don't see how we can neatly say that a
>> chivalrous author will refuse to put his female
>> characters in harms way. That's like saying only
>> an anti-semite would write novels about Auschwitz,
>> isn't it?

> If an author complusively wrote novels about Jews being tortured and 
> killed, I'd at least suspect him of anti-semitism.

There is a technical term for this kind of criticism = "the poetic of a
police informer."

I don't think the aim of reading books is to find some crime to accuse
author of.




-- 
Best regards,
 Stanislaus                           mailto:sbocian at poczta.fm


----------------------------------------------------------------------
PS. >>> http://link.interia.pl/f19a6

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net