Urth Net

← back to the conversation

The Katharine maid

Tim Walters · 28 Oct 2006, 06:15 · from 2006-October.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: walters at doubtfulpalace.com (Tim Walters)
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:15:00 -0700
Subject: (urth) The Katharine maid
In-Reply-To: <002e01c6fa3c$43403160$273ec6d8 at rclackey.stic.net>
References: <002e01c6fa3c$43403160$273ec6d8 at rclackey.stic.net>
Message-ID: <7B426BAD-F239-43BF-900B-5C80575EB3DF at doubtfulpalace.com>

On Oct 27, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Roy C. Lackey wrote:
>
> The dictionary citations both of you have given support my reading.

No, they don't. Nathan Spears' citation ("Two children borne by her  
earlier") is exactly analogous to Wolfe's clause ("the Severian of  
bone and flesh borne by Catherine in a cell..."), leaving no room for  
doubt that Wolfe's sentence can sensibly be read as being about  
Severian's birth.

In my opinion, that's the only unstrained reading, but that's less  
certain.


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net