The Katharine maid
Nathan Spears · 29 Oct 2006, 04:13
· from 2006-October.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: spearofsolomon at yahoo.com (Nathan Spears) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: (urth) The Katharine maid Message-ID: <20061029041314.33060.qmail at web54403.mail.yahoo.com> Aha! I missed that. It does seem like a contradiction. But in a world without baby formula, perhaps the wet-nurse puts her milk in a bottle. The torturers might refuse to let the children breastfeed for psychological reasons. I was also going to suggest that perhaps the "stand under the bar" rules applies literally to children that the torturers "take." That is, perhaps they don't accept a child into the ranks until they can stand on their feet, but at that point they wouldn't be breastfeeding anyway. I second the opinion that it's just an oversight by Wolfe. ----- Original Message ---- From: Daniel D Jones <ddjones at riddlemaster.org> To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 4:22:30 PM Subject: Re: (urth) The Katharine maid On Saturday 28 October 2006 16:47, Nathan Spears wrote: > > I don't see any resolution for the apparently contradictory sentences > > about wet nurses and knowing no breasts. I suspect this was an error on > > Wolf's part. > > What statement about wet nurses? Looking at the Baby Sev post I found this line: > > The key part of this quote is "the children the torturers take know no > > breasts", which seems to contradict his earlier statement about wet-nurses. > > but I'm not clear on what the earlier statement is. Chapter 2 of Shadow: "...when a woman big with child is sent to us we open her and if the babe draws breath engage a wet-nurse if it be a boy. The females are rendered to the witches..." It seems to me the line saying that the children the torturers take know no breast is a direct contradiction to the above which says they engage a wet nurse. At least, the only definition I'm familiar with for "wet nurse" is a woman who suckles another woman's child. If it is a contradiction, then the question is whether it's an error of Severian's or Wolfe's. I suspect it's Wolfe's. I can see any point or significance to Severian misleading the reader in so subtle and trivial a manner. Outside of that apparent error, I don't see any contradictions or issues with Severian being born in the tower. As I see it, the torturers, if they have children, do not bring them into the guild. The guild is replenished by the children of their clients. A woman who is remanded into their care for torture is given a Caesarian. Male children who survive are raised as torturers. We know, however, that some clients are merely imprisoned for extended periods until their sentence is handed down. The text doesn't specifically say but it seems unlikely that a pregnant woman would be given a Caesarian while her ultimate disposition has yet to be decided. After all, it's possible she'll be released. Thus it seems not only possible but likely that some women do give birth while imprisoned in the tower, if only those who are awaiting final judgement and disposition. I don't see any issue or contradiction with Severian being born to Catherine while she was a prisoner but before her sentence had been handed down. Once her sentence was given, it was executed and Severian was "taken" into the guild. _______________________________________________ Urth Mailing List To post, write urth at urth.net Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net