Pas's gammadion and the voided cross

Matthew King · 22 Jan 2007, 05:03 · from 2007-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: automatthew at gmail.com (Matthew King)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:03:12 -0700
Subject: (urth) Pas's gammadion and the voided cross
In-Reply-To: <20070122043136.69855.qmail at web82101.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20070122043136.69855.qmail at web82101.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <7184BACC-37ED-4992-A4FC-B0DA7E2EB218 at gmail.com>


On Jan 21, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Chris Mulder wrote:

> Well, the more I read, the less of a firm idea I have of what it  
> looks like. I guess the sign of addition is a plus-type cross, but  
> a voided cross? what does it mean to void a cross? Like a null sign  
> through a cross? or like the four 90 degree angles of a maltese  
> cross?  A photo would be most illuminating.

  Some of the interesting posts on this topic in the archive:

Referencing a Wolfe Q&A session:
http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0007/0528.shtml

The full Q&A post, since I have trouble finding it when I want it:
http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0007/0511.shtml

Older:

http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0002/0059.shtml

http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0002/0063.shtml

http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0005/0312.shtml

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net