Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Is Borskis (sp?) Theory Wright?

Michael Straight · 12 Apr 2007, 16:44 · from 2007-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: mfstraight at gmail.com (Michael Straight)
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:44:34 -0600
Subject: (urth) Is Borskis (sp?) Theory Wright?
In-Reply-To: <BAY129-F164C432BBE8817196D8F7D86590 at phx.gbl>
References: <134397.97696.qm at web51710.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
	<BAY129-F164C432BBE8817196D8F7D86590 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <d716a1c40704120944l1104d8a9u6477abd79826ba43 at mail.gmail.com>

On 4/9/07, Chris <rasputin_ at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Also, it simply isn't a particularly *interesting* story this way.

I agree.  And that's the only criteria I recognize.

I'm fine with people coming up with interpretations that might be at
odds with Wolfe's actual intent.  But they've got to make the story
more interesting, not less.

Rostrum


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net