ot-my mini review of Children of Hurin
Jesper Svedberg · 16 Apr 2007, 21:05
· from 2007-April.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: jsvedberg at gmail.com (Jesper Svedberg) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:05:18 +0200 Subject: (urth) ot-my mini review of Children of Hurin In-Reply-To: <428900.56593.qm at web32402.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <428900.56593.qm at web32402.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4623E50E.1020105 at gmail.com> don doggett skrev: > --- Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com> wrote: > > >>I would make a guess (and I'm fairly confident of >>it, though I too hope >>Don will step forth and say in his own words what he >>meant) that the >>estimable Mr Doggett was suggesting that, though it >>contains elements >>of the fantastic, Tolkien's work was not created in >>the context of the >>commercial genre of "fantasy," as we know it today, > > > Thanks Dan'l! This is more or less exactly what I > meant, especially regarding the Children of Hurin, and > the tales in the Silmarillion. They are written in the > tradition of myth and epic romance - Tolkien was > playing a different game, so to speak. It strikes me as very weird to define the book after what it tries to be rather than what it is. The fact is that when you look at what kind of story it is, it is indistinguishable from much modern fantasy. It's a secondary world story with magical or fantastical elements that draws its estetical inspiration from myth and epics, like most modern epic fantasy of quality. The fact that there are some hideously unoriginal role playing stories doesn't change this fact. Tolkien did not invent this tradition. Before him there were writers like William Morris, Lord Dunsany and E. R. Eddison who did similar things and just because the tradition hadn't spawned widely marketable genre until after Tolkien doesn't make his stuff much different from what came later. // Jesper
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net