Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Aunt Jeannine isn't an abo...

William H. Ansley · 19 Jun 1998, 00:31 · from urth-v0014.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "William H. Ansley" <wansley at warwick.net>
Subject: (urth) Aunt Jeannine isn't an abo...
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 00:31:25
Message-ID: <urth-v0014-0053 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0014/0053.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Aunt Jeannine isn't an abo, she's a dead abo priest!

I don't believe this but I could have argued it from the parallels I found
between the first and second novellas of 5HC. (I couldn't have argued it
convincingly, but I could have argued it.) I just started this way to see
if alga would notice.

>But even if V.R.T. had somehow inherited Marsch's knowledge, how would
>that tell him #5's a clone?  He hasn't seen #5's father; all #5 tells him
>is "'I'm supposed to look a great deal like my father,'" something not
>uncommon among us non-clones, not "'I'm supposed to look exactly like my
>father did at my age'"; and as far as I know clones per se have no
>distinguishing marks.  It's a strange passage (and has been so noted
>earlier on this list, IIRC).  Maybe he saw a photograph of #5's father
>somewhere.  Another, perhaps less likely, possibility is that V.R.T. has
>heard rumors that there is a wealthy family of clones somewhere on St.
>Croix, and when he meets #5 and hear his remark he thinks "Oh, maybe this
>is _that_ family."  I agree that it's best to stick as close to the text
>as possible, but I think the above suggestions are preferable in this
>regard to positing an otherwise unmentioned ability in V.R.T.

I assume that you mean personality merging when you say "otherwise
unmentioned ability in V.R.T." alga is the one who suggested the merger
theory, not me. I don't accept it any more than you do, as I attempted to
say in the message you are quoting from. I find the "Are you a clone?"
passage strange for the precise reasons you do, as I also attempted to say
in an earlier message.

Although I can't recall any direct evidence right now, I certainly got the
impression in 5HC that the whole clone business was kept a deep, dark
secret and successfully so. Thus, I find the idea of VRT having some other
source of knowledge about the Wolfes unlikely.

My feeling right now is that VRT just guessed right about #5 being a clone.
(I am tending to the "all wild guesses in 5HC are true" theory. Now all I
have to do is precisely define "wild" as it pertains to guesses and create
a numerical scale of wildness, list all the guesses in 5HC, rate them on
the wild-o-meter and figure out the 'wild'/'not wild' cut off point, then
search the text for evidence of whether they came true or not. I should
have it done before lunch tomorrow. 8->) So he could have read up on
anthropological relaxation between that time and the time of the fatal
meeting with #5 and Maitre.

Which is what you said, IIRC.

For two guys who agree so much we are exchanging a lot of messages. 8-)

William Ansley



*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net