Urth Net

← back to the conversation

The Distant Suns of Gene Wolfe

JBarach at aol.com · 01 Jun 2007, 17:00 · from 2007-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: JBarach at aol.com (JBarach at aol.com)
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:00:53 EDT
Subject: (urth) The Distant Suns of Gene Wolfe
Message-ID: <bec.10501ad1.3391aac5 at aol.com>

 
In a message dated 6/1/2007 9:56:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time,  
david at slack.com writes:

I think  the veteran New York editor is mistaken.  Maybe she would not be
able  to sell her publisher on a young Gene Wolfe, but David Hartwell would
have  no problem with it.



But it's arguable that it's precisely the influence of writers like Wolfe  
that would prompt Hartwell to pick up "Wolfe" if he was writing today.  No  
past-Wolfe, no present market for Wolfe perhaps?
 
John



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20070601/c5f9224d/attachment.htm 

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net