The Distant Suns of Gene Wolfe
Michael Straight · 04 Jun 2007, 19:01
· from 2007-June.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: mfstraight at gmail.com (Michael Straight) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:01:00 -0600 Subject: (urth) The Distant Suns of Gene Wolfe In-Reply-To: <739190.56543.qm at web36909.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <d716a1c40705290826i6e0dddeay6091daedc16ab7f7 at mail.gmail.com> <739190.56543.qm at web36909.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <d716a1c40706041201s259fe068n76d9e33ca8ccfa5 at mail.gmail.com> On 5/29/07, Craig Brewer <cnbrewer at yahoo.com> wrote: > I'm curious what you might mention as valuable and > worthwhile when trying to convince people to read > Wolfe. I say this only partly to ask what you feel > this reviewer omits. But it's also because I've had > trouble myself summarizing all that I find compelling > about him when suggesting that others read him. That's why this kind of review kinda bothers me, because I feel somewhat at a loss myself to put my finger on why Wolfe is my favorite writer. I'll give it a try. I'd welcome anyone else trying to articulate "Why is Wolfe great?" or even just "Why I love Wolfe," especially geared toward people who haven't read him before. Beauty to start with. Wolfe is like one of those actors who could read aloud from the phone book and have you on the edge of your seat. Remember the scene where Auk explains to Silk how his needler works? You've seen technology info-dumps a million times, and there's certainly nothing new about an electromagnetic railgun, but passage is a marvel of simplicity - it uses no scientific jargon but explains the scientific principles involved in a way a child could understand, and at the same time is very convincingly Auk's voice and perspective. The last chapter of Soldier of Arete is like a jewel: in the sheer beauty of Pindar's prose; in density?so much is said with so few words; and in flashes of light?every other sentence illuminating whole chapters of what has come before (or will come after). And it's not just beautiful language, but beautiful events - the Sidhe's dwindling flock of birds, Severian's matter-of-fact charity to the Green Man, Marble's sacrifice for her adopted grand-daughter. Wolfe's writing is full of these wonderful moments. One aspect of that beauty is Wolfe's ability to suggest rather than tell. His ability to plant these subtle bombs in the text that will later explode into something weird or wonderful or both. I'll never forget the moment I noticed the significance of the elm tree falling at the beginning of Peace. Or the way he can so casually pull the rug out from under you. As when Nadan mentions that he's gone back and changed stuff in the diary you've been reading. Wolfe's ability to make convincing a certain kind of miraculous wonder is right up there with Tolkein. He does this wonderful thing in the New Sun books where you start out thinking you're reading a fantasy novel. But then he subtly convinces you that all these marvels you're seeing have a scientific explanation. And then once you've realized that this is the sort of story where miracles don't happen, he shows you one. And so it seems like a genuine miracle, not just another bit of fantasy magic. I think that the games Wolfe plays with narrative voice offer a lot of insight into the way we really know things, particularly for people like me interested in issues of faith. You're never going to to have a third-person omniscient account of what happened to Silk or Severian or Latro. No one ever knows things like that, even though we tell ourselves those sorts of stories all the time. I think the Outsider is real, not because Wolfe told me so, but because I believe Horn and Nettle and their children. I've also mentioned before that I think reading Wolfe's books is a good school in the virtue that C.S. Lewis called "Preferring the Given." Wolfe is constantly setting you up to expect a certain kind of story, making think you're going to see, and want to see, certain events. Then he turns the corner and shows you something completely different, gives you a very different story. If you cling to your expectations, you'll be frustrated and miss the good thing that's in front of you because it's not the imagined good you were expecting. Real life is like that a lot. I also think Wolfe has a lot of interesting exploration of the meaning and responsibilities of power. His protagonists are, in general, mightier than their foes, and their conflicts are often more about struggling with the responsibility of strength than struggling against the limitations of weakness. Wolfe is able to depict Goodness, Kindness, Strangeness, Evil in ways that seem very genuine and insightful to me. I'd try to elaborate, but then I'd never finish this. And of course Wolfe is very intellectually stimulating. For those that enjoy that kind of reading, Wolfe is enormously fun and satisfying. (But, as I said in another post, let's not kid ourselves and think that our taste for that kind of thing makes us somehow better than people who don't care for it.) Rostrum
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net