What the elm?
JWillard · 07 Jun 2007, 06:50
· from 2007-June.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: aldenweer at charter.net (JWillard) Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:50:32 -0600 Subject: (urth) What the elm? In-Reply-To: <1f7617370706061200q118e1f70vee0d21fbe58f1b8b at mail.gmail.com> References: <1f7617370706061021l58ab60d9mb061d38f49a33bef at mail.gmail.com> <4BB1A159-5DE4-4650-BE1E-53234D90ABF6 at gmail.com> <1f7617370706061131k6f515373u3a0b6b7b5f81636e at mail.gmail.com> <AFFBEF6E-6789-4CDC-A0C5-EAE87DEFD886 at gmail.com> <1f7617370706061200q118e1f70vee0d21fbe58f1b8b at mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4667AAB8.8080100 at charter.net> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: >On 6/6/07, Matthew King <automatthew at gmail.com> wrote: > > >>The discovery of an allusion, in other words, should not spawn new >>problems in interpretation. >> >> > >I like that phrasing best. > > > I think the mistake is to assume an allusion is just some sort of homage or a wink and a nod: I don't know if it's that simple. I'm starting to think more and more that Virgil and Dante are extremely important to Wolfe (Averns, anyone?). Given their contributions to the Roman Catholic faith, this would not be surprising. I'm curious if there are any connections to Augustine, as well. (And someone might have pointed all of this out, but I have less and less time to read and confer with previous posts.) Recently started reading Inferno, and Dante's choices of focus are striking to a Wolfean: Charon is there, of course, and Nessus carries Dante across one of the rivers. I think it's quite possible that the Book of the New Sun is Wolfe playing with the Divine Comedy. Another influence, that I've never really seen anyone address, is Nabokov. Wolfe admits the influence, and Nabokov is a tricky, tricky man, and I believe Wolfe learned much from him. Here is a passage from the introduction to the Annotated Lolita (Which Wolfe might well have read) called, fittingly, Nabokov's Puppet Show, and which, when I read it, blared "Wolfe!" to me. (In your mind, substitute Wolfe for Nabokov, and see what you think.) "Nabokov's remarks on Gogol help to underscore this analogical definition of involution: "All reality is a mask," he writes (p.148), and Nabokov's narratives are masques, stagings of his own inventions rather than recreations of the naturalistic world. But, since the latter is what most readers expect and demand of fiction, many still do not understand what Nabokov is doing. They are not accustomed to "the allusions to something else behind the crudely painted screens"(p.142), where the "real plots behind the obvious ones are taking place." There are thus at least two "plots" in all of Nabokov's fiction: the characters in the book, and the consciousness of the creator above it - the "real plot" which is visible in the "gaps" and "holes" in the narrative....Although other writers have created involuted works, Nabokov's self-consciousness is supreme; and the range and scale of his effects, his mastery and control, make him unique." There's much more. I know that in my own experience, the second reading of any Wolfe work is almost radically different from the first. As if I were reading a *different* book. Nabokov is the only other author I've had this reaction to. In The White Goddess, Graves mentions the connection between the elm and the vine of Dionysus - which, as Borski's pointed out, is what Dennis is short for.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net