Vance and Tokien as influences on D&D
Dave Lebling · 09 Jun 2007, 18:09
· from 2007-June.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: dlebling at hyraxes.com (Dave Lebling) Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 14:09:01 -0400 Subject: (urth) Vance and Tokien as influences on D&D In-Reply-To: <BAY135-F33E3BF82625B8BA8AA2DDD88240 at phx.gbl> References: <BAY135-F33E3BF82625B8BA8AA2DDD88240 at phx.gbl> Message-ID: <466AECBD.6050309 at hyraxes.com> Bob Miller wrote: > I guess I'm a minority person on Vance. I always thought the Dying Earth > stories relatively weak beside much, not all, of his other stuff. Of > course, I never did read anything from Cugel's Saga inclusive on. Well, chacun a son gout, as the French folks say. I've always found Vance's fantasy stuff to be his best work (with the exception on the SF side of of the first couple of Demon Princes novels). A couple of things to remember about the Dying Earth stories. First, they are just that; the "novel" is really just a story collection. The Cugel books are pretty episodic as well, and were broken up for publication; I don't know whether they started as a novel or as a bunch of stories. The later things (like "Fader's Waft") were also stories. As stories they stand pretty tall. Second, keep in mind when the original Dying Earth stories were published, and compare and contrast against what else was coming out in the fantasy genre: not much. It was post-Unknown, and F&SF was doing contemporary fantasy more than Cabell- or Lord Dunsany-influenced works. The only similar things that were happening were Leiber's Grey Mouser stories, also heavily influenced by Dunsany and Cabell. Howard was already in the past. Vance was a breath of fresh air. By today's standards he's a bit mannered, and if you read a huge chunk of his writing you see the same themes, even the same phrasings, pop up again and again. In my opinion, D&D was influenced heavily by Vance, Leiber and Howard, and of course Tolkien. It goes without saying that contemporary fantasy computer games are utterly in their debt as well. Dave Lebling, aka vizcacha
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net