The problem of Cthulhu

brunians at brunians.org · 21 Jun 2007, 02:28 · from 2007-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:28:13 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: (urth) The problem of Cthulhu
In-Reply-To: <14E2ADEB-8BC1-4271-A091-BFCDA872FCC2 at gmail.com>
References: <ca7.11d9f10a.33ab2eec at aol.com>
	<12103.67.142.130.38.1182389983.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<14E2ADEB-8BC1-4271-A091-BFCDA872FCC2 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9501.67.142.130.23.1182392893.squirrel at brunians.org>

> On Jun 20, 2007, at 8:39 PM, brunians at brunians.org wrote:

>> To me, the question is basically whether Plato, Snorre Sturluson
>> and the Mahabharata are more or less reliable than a bunch of twentieth
and
>> early twenty-first century theoreticians. That's a no-brainer.

>    I think I may love you.

You're sweet. But agape, or philia, please, not eros.




.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net