The problem of Cthulhu

brunians at brunians.org · 21 Jun 2007, 08:39 · from 2007-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 04:39:45 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: (urth) The problem of Cthulhu
In-Reply-To: <E1I1Gp5-0002kB-RC at pr-webmail-2.demon.net>
References: <E1I1Gp5-0002kB-RC at pr-webmail-2.demon.net>
Message-ID: <5941.67.142.130.36.1182415185.squirrel at brunians.org>

matthew at calmeilles.co.uk writes:
> Batrinque at aol.com wrote:

>> To date, no DNA evidence exists of any genetic contribution to
>> presentday humans.

http://genetics.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pgen.0020105.eor

> "Using sequence data from the Environmental Genome Project, we find strong
> evidence for ancient admixture in both a European and a West African
> population (p ~ 10^{-7}), with contributions to the modern gene pool of at
> least 5%. While Neanderthals form an obvious archaic source population
> candidate in Europe, there is not yet a clear source population candidate
> in West Africa."

Dude.




.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net