The problem of Cthulhu

Batrinque at aol.com · 21 Jun 2007, 10:28 · from 2007-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Batrinque at aol.com (Batrinque at aol.com)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 06:28:54 EDT
Subject: (urth) The problem of Cthulhu
Message-ID: <bd4.10f777f6.33abace6 at aol.com>

In a message dated 6/20/2007 11:26:46 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
brunians at brunians.org writes:

Remember  African Eve? Don't hear too much about her anymore.

The reason you  don't is because after they presented their paper, someone
went over their  evidence and pointed out that it was messed up: that it is
true that they  could trace each sample to their posited African Eve, or
they could work  the same sample a slightly different way and come up with
other Eves, both  in and out of Africa.

And subsequently someone went over the counterarguement and concluded that  
THAT analysis was wrong.  African Eve is alive and well, and so is a later  
African Adam.  Recent African Origin at the moment at least widely accepted  as 
being the best model for present human ancestry.

Bruce  Trinque
Amston, CT

************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20070621/f661796c/attachment.htm

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net