"Unrequited Love", take two

Roy C. Lackey · 03 Jul 2007, 06:48 · from 2007-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: rclackey at stic.net (Roy C. Lackey)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 01:48:51 -0500
Subject: (urth) "Unrequited Love", take two
Message-ID: <000c01c7bd3e$3a7ad920$cac95a42 at rclackey.stic.net>

I've read this story several more times, and I may well be wrong in thinking
that the narrator is an over-the-hill robot boy. There are a few details
that make more sense if he is a mature human male. However, I can find
nothing to suggest that Julianne's parents are robots. In fact, in a
human-engineered society where human children seem to be at a premium, I
very much doubt that robot couples would be allowed to foster human
children, even if robot couples even existed, a proposition for which I can
see no justification in the story.

But for use of the plural-possessive pronoun "our", referring to the
narrator's back yard, we might suppose that he lived alone. He makes no
specific mention of another person or persons in his house, other than to
state that there are no children in it. The most logical assumption is that
he has a wife and that, like the Robinsons, they are either unable or
unwilling to have children, which is why he could not blame them for being
in the same situation he was in. But he could -- and probably did -- blame
them for acquiring a robot child, just as he later became incensed when he
learned that Julianne's parents were getting her a robot dog in reaction to
the robot girl getting a real dog.

Despite the fact that most houses in the neighborhood housed no real
children, robot children did not dominate. There were three robot children
in Roberta's first-grade class and seven human children, of which five of
the latter group were boys. If Julianne's best friend was a new(*) robot,
that says more about her than it does Roberta or the society she lives in.
Sadness is a part of the human condition, whatever its cause(s). Julianne
had the opportunity to make friends with the other six human classmates
before Roberta ever came on the scene, but she didn't, for whatever reason.
(Part of her sadness may stem from being made to feel stupid relative to the
obviously much more knowledgeable robot children, who are in school only to
conform with their owner's fantasies.)

Rover instinctively understood that Robber was a thing, not a dog. It is
unclear, however, that six-year-old Julianne realized that Roberta was a
mere robot.

Is there any significance to Wolfe's use of the British spelling of "grey"?

[(*) It took me several readings before the point of Roberta's "little
laptop in a shiny new bag" struck me. The first time the narrator saw
Roberta was on her way to school in **May**, near the end of the school
year, not the beginning. Apparently, Roberta hadn't been around in April.]

-Roy

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net