Theodicy

Alice Turner · 01 Jul 1997, 09:23 · from urth-v0002.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Alice Turner" <al at interport.net>
Subject: (urth) Theodicy
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 09:23:56
Message-ID: <urth-v0002-0128 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0002/0128.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[Posted from URTH, a mailing list about Gene Wolfe's New Sun and other work=
s]

> 	Gimmeabreak! Was Shakespeare writing tracts instead of plays, because he
> had messages for the monarchs?=20

This does not parse.

> >> Slimey Alga wrote:
> >>=20
> >> >Ratty,
> >> >
> >> >I define a Christian as someone who believes that he or she will
attain
> >> >eternal salvation through Jesus Christ. Severian has never heard of
> >Jesus
> >> >Christ, and he himself has brought salvation (through destruction) to
> >Urth.
> >>=20
> >> 	Whoa! Agia refers to the Theoanthropos in 1:21. Also, in that chapter
> >the
> >> woman missionary (Marie - Mary) is reading from the Urth equivalent of
> >> Deuteronomy 34. (1:21 =3D Shadow, ch. 21).

[skip]
> 	Well, there are two questions here: 1. Is there a "Jesus Christ" in the
> Urth/Whorl universe; and 2. Is Severian a self-conscious follower of that
> person? The answer to "1" is what I was dealing with. Some wrote that
Jesus
> is unknown in the Urth/Whorl universe. I pointed out that he clearly is,
> because of "Theoanthropos." The more obvious line of evidence is the Silk
> quartet, where references to the crucifixion, to the sign of the cross,
> etc. are more in evidence.
> 	As for question 2., I don't know. Wolfe says that Severian is not what
he
> regards as a Christ figure (allegory of Christ, I take it), but a
Christian
> figure (allegory of a Christian, I take it). I don't understand why
anyone
> wants to insist that Wolfe intends something he has stated clearly that
he
> does not intend.

Almost certainly, Agia's Theoanthropos does refer to JC, though probably
not consciously. (If it were conscious, and she a believer, that would be
interesting, considering her character.) But he's not the only hero with
such claims. Gilgamesh was 2/3 god and only 1/3 human; Herakles was 1/2
god. And so on. Urth is very old, and ancient stories tend to conflate, as
the Brown Book shows us again and again. The Theoanthropos could be taken
as a composite figure, as indeed Silk's Outsider seems to be. In any case,
he doesn't seem to register with Severian.

As for Severian's being a Christian, well, let's agree to differ. Your idea
(and perhaps Wolfe's) of what constitutes a Christian, even allegorically
(whatever that may mean in this context), is not mine, nor, it seems, that
of many of the rest of this group. =20

[skip: kittens as baseballs]
> 	Well, that's (a) an irrelevant ad hominem argument, and (b) at least as
> false as true.

(a) Granted. (I did put it in parens.) (b.) How so?

> 	BTW, are you the authoress of a book on hell that I happen to have on my
> shelf?

I haven't looked at your shelf recently, but probably. Quaint term.

-alga-

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net