Long Review Essay on Wizard Knight
Michael Straight · 19 Sep 2007, 17:28
· from 2007-September.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: mfstraight at gmail.com (Michael Straight) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:28:34 -0600 Subject: (urth) Long Review Essay on Wizard Knight In-Reply-To: <p06100502c315bed02c59 at 192.168.0.3> References: <p06100502c315bed02c59 at 192.168.0.3> Message-ID: <d716a1c40709191028n293019cbla5e7d6770b8e48f6 at mail.gmail.com> On 9/18/07, Stephen Frug <sfrug at post.harvard.edu> wrote: > had the writer stacking the deck for him at every turn. He had more > magical allies, artifacts, assistants, companions, than you could > shake a stick at: an invisible ogre doing his bidding! A sky-wolf who > happened to be totally loyal! Elves (called Aelf) who were his slaves > (yes, not always reliable, but often enough). A magic sword, the > blessing and friendship of Odin, various other magic devices he got > at the end (the helmet, another sword). Heck, he even becomes a god > halfway through the work! Talk about favoritism!* See, I think this is one of the more interesting things that Wolfe does with his protagonists. In most fantasy, the protagonist is weaker than all his enemies and the drama comes from struggling to overcome a stronger foe. But in Wizard Knight (and many other of Wolfe's books) the protagonist is stronger than most of his foes and the drama comes from the moral dilemnas of how to wisely and honorably use that strength. I'd think this would be particularly compelling for someone who finds his reading colored by current geopolitical events, since is pretty much the circumstance in which the United States finds itself as a nation. As for the feudal / knightly society. I don't think Wolfe admires it uncritically nor intends the reader to. I think there are some things he admires about that society and some things he doesn't, and that many of the places where you feel uncomfortable with it, you are supposed to. I'd be interested in a discussion of what people think are the specific virtues that Wolfe does commend from that society which he thinks are lacking in ours and whether we agree with him about those virtues. That's what I'm going to be trying to pin down when I re-read the books. Rostrum
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net