Theodicy

Jim Jordan · 01 Jul 1997, 17:43 · from urth-v0002.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Jim Jordan <jbjordan at gnt.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Theodicy
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 1997 17:43:45
Message-ID: <urth-v0002-0130 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0002/0130.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


[Posted from URTH, a mailing list about Gene Wolfe's New Sun and other work=
s]

At 09:23 AM 7/1/97 -0400, you wrote:


NUTRIA: 	Gimmeabreak! Was Shakespeare writing tracts instead of plays,
because he
>> had messages for the monarchs?=20
>
ALGA:>This does not parse.

	I took you as writing that if Wolfe had an anti-idolatry polemic in his
works, they would not be literature.=20


ALGA: >Almost certainly, Agia's Theoanthropos does refer to JC, though
probably
>not consciously. (If it were conscious, and she a believer, that would be
>interesting, considering her character.) But he's not the only hero with
>such claims. Gilgamesh was 2/3 god and only 1/3 human; Herakles was 1/2
>god. And so on. Urth is very old, and ancient stories tend to conflate, as
>the Brown Book shows us again and again. The Theoanthropos could be taken
>as a composite figure, as indeed Silk's Outsider seems to be. In any case,
>he doesn't seem to register with Severian.

	Well, I agree about Agia as a person. And I cannot gainsay your other
points as well. But I don't think Wolfe believes that Christianity will
disappear in the far future, so the assumption that Christianity is simply
unknown at that time does not "parse." Silk's religion certainly has a good
deal of it in the background, and his enlightenments clearly show Christ.

>
>As for Severian's being a Christian, well, let's agree to differ. Your idea
>(and perhaps Wolfe's) of what constitutes a Christian, even allegorically
>(whatever that may mean in this context), is not mine, nor, it seems, that
>of many of the rest of this group. =20

	Sure. We can lay it to rest, FOR NOW!!!!!!

The Rat

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net