The hut in the jungle

Tony Ellis · 15 Nov 2007, 22:48 · from 2007-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: tonyellis69 at btopenworld.com (Tony Ellis)
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:48:30 +0000
Subject: (urth) The hut in the jungle
Message-ID: <9a33123d0711151448x7ec4f893n5cf1558fa9640be0 at mail.gmail.com>

I've long been intrigued by the mystery of whether Severian and Agia
actually travel to the past, or whether the people in the hut are
simply "chant-caught" Urthians as Agia argues. There seems to be ample
evidence for either interpretation.

On the one hand, the Gardens seem too big for the building that
contains them, contain species which the Curator cheerfully describes
as "extinct", and there's just sky where we should see panes of glass.
And Robert and Marie talk like genuine 20th century people - where
would Urthians, even chant-caught Urthians, get such ideas as
mail-planes and painting in Paris from?

On the other hand, Wolfe allows Agia to expand on her explanation -
that Father Inire has invested the gardens with a "conjuration" that
entraps visitors - at some length. The minds of such victims bend to
conform to their surroundings, the edges of the glass panes are simply
concealed by tree limbs, and so forth.

Broadly speaking, Agia's explanations are rationalist: it's all
trickery, it's literally done with mirrors. Whereas if we accept
Severian's observations at face value, then something miraculous is
taking place. Are we being left to choose the explanation that most
appeals to us?

Perhaps, but on the third hand, Agia is the one who seems to be on the
back foot. Severian trumps every answer she gives with another
question, until she acknowledges that she doesn't have all the
answers. That suggests that the miraculous explanation really *is* the
right one, and that Wolfe is cautioning us against Agia's brand of
hard-headed scepticism.

These days I tend to favour a middle road: the Gardens *do* bend back
in time, but Urthian visitors aren't real in that past. They're
ghosts, "spirits of the future" as Robert says. Robert can temporarily
see them because he's sick with malaria, Isangoma because he's a
shaman. The Gardens have a seductive effect on the minds of sensitive
people, as Agia says, but this is due to their deep roots in Urth's
past rather than some sort of deliberate ploy on the part of Father
Inire and the Autarch.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net