Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Questions . . .

Matthew King · 27 Nov 2007, 20:32 · from 2007-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: automatthew at gmail.com (Matthew King)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:32:12 -0600
Subject: (urth) Questions . . .
In-Reply-To: <4902.67.142.130.17.1196190068.squirrel at brunians.org>
References: <4E82554550FE5149AD4B30A4FEA22492AF8A82 at xchange.briercrest.ca>
	<1f7617370711270934w34193140m7837bf9d0dadc402 at mail.gmail.com>
	<A198704B-693B-4493-8850-F4DD43427119 at gmail.com>
	<4902.67.142.130.17.1196190068.squirrel at brunians.org>
Message-ID: <85704B00-45DD-4D8E-92E2-C694FAB295D3 at gmail.com>

On Nov 27, 2007, at 1:01 PM, brunians at brunians.org wrote:

>>  A fair translation of this passage would admit that we really
>> don't know what Paul meant by opposing psuchikon to pneumatikon,
>> perhaps by just adjectivizing the word "soul".
>
> Pardon, the differentiation between soul and spirit (breath) is  
> ancient.
> Way older than St Paul.

Nephesh and ruah, sure.

> It's also pretty clear what is meant by the two
> terms.

I meant to refer to the distinction between the terms "soma  
psuchikon" and "soma pneumatikon", not the distinction between psuche  
and pneuma, which is better understood.  And, dear Brunians, you may  
be clear on the difference between soul and spirit, but that sets you  
apart from 'most everyone I know.  Mushy-thinking about resurrection  
and the afterlife seems to be a characteristic of modern, unmoored,  
post-Protestant Christianity.

On the topic of soul/psuche/nephesh, Brunians, have you read any of  
Rupert Sheldrake's work on morphogenetic fields? 
  

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net