Questions . . .

Matthew King · 27 Nov 2007, 21:06 · from 2007-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: automatthew at gmail.com (Matthew King)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:06:27 -0600
Subject: (urth) Questions . . .
In-Reply-To: <BAY129-W428429ADA9BD9C7D8BCC7E86760 at phx.gbl>
References: <4E82554550FE5149AD4B30A4FEA22492AF8A82 at xchange.briercrest.ca>
	<1f7617370711270934w34193140m7837bf9d0dadc402 at mail.gmail.com>
	<A198704B-693B-4493-8850-F4DD43427119 at gmail.com>
	<4902.67.142.130.17.1196190068.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<BAY129-W428429ADA9BD9C7D8BCC7E86760 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <B6F9F986-C180-488F-820B-D0B15281D8CF at gmail.com>

On Nov 27, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Chris wrote:

> If it's the Word of God then anything essential to know that's in  
> it can be "understood" in any language.

Yikes.  I can smell the brimstone fuming from Brunians's next missive  
already.

I can agree with this statement insofar as it parallels the idea of  
Turing-completeness in programming languages.  Anything you can do in  
one Turing complete language can be done in another.  But some things  
that are easy to do in one language are extremely difficult in  
others.  Greenspun's Tenth Rule is the classic expression of this idea*.

Back to human languages, Modern English is ill-suited for discussions  
hinging on the Greek words phileo, eros, and agape.  This is an old  
trope in the churches I've attended, but its hoariness doesn't  
completely obscure my point, I think.  The word "charity" used to be  
a good analogue of agape, but we've somehow managed to conflate  
charity with alms.

Another way I could agree with Chris's statement is to interpret it  
as saying that God has caused the scriptures to be so constituted  
that the important bits, what we humans need to know to get along  
with Him, will survive the poorest honest translations.

---
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenspun's_Tenth_Rule

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net