Questions . . .

brunians at brunians.org · 27 Nov 2007, 21:19 · from 2007-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:19:56 -0500 (EST)
Subject: (urth) Questions . . .
In-Reply-To: <BAY129-W428429ADA9BD9C7D8BCC7E86760 at phx.gbl>
References: <4E82554550FE5149AD4B30A4FEA22492AF8A82 at xchange.briercrest.ca>
	<1f7617370711270934w34193140m7837bf9d0dadc402 at mail.gmail.com>
	<A198704B-693B-4493-8850-F4DD43427119 at gmail.com>
	<4902.67.142.130.17.1196190068.squirrel at brunians.org>
	<BAY129-W428429ADA9BD9C7D8BCC7E86760 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <9946.67.142.130.36.1196198396.squirrel at brunians.org>

> Brunians said:
>> Speak for yourself.

>> Anyone who wants to understand scripture reads it in the original.

> Well, assuming that you're not really reading it *as* scripture. If it's
> the Word of God then anything essential to know that's in it can be
> "understood" in any language. If you're reading it as just a piece of
> literature or historical document then you're definitely correct. Though
> of course one has to beware of thinking one understands dead languages too
> well.

I dunno about that. Quran is in Arabic. Translations of Quran are not
Quran. Not only are the Vedas in Sanskrit, they are not written, not the
real ones. The real ones are held in the memory of the people who know
them, a specialized class of Brahmins, some of whom are brought up with
Sanskrit as their mother tongue. The process of learning Sanskrit is
itself interesting.

Any of these veda knowers could write you out the words of the vedas, but
those aren't the real vedas. The real vedas are the living books held in
the minds of the people who know them.

The Indians, especially, are adept at having something be revealed truth
and also an historical document and also several other things.

Christians, and especially Protestant Christians, tend to assume that the
way theology works for them is the way it works for everyone. This is not
the case. Judaism is the closest to Christianity, and there are vast
differences in the way revealed truth is treated between the two. A minor
example: to die as a Jew, you must recite the Sh'ma as close to death as
you can manage it. It is an assertion or a declaration: 'Hear Oh Israel,
____ our God, ____ is One." You don't have to believe it: you can believe
what you like. Belief is not all that important in Judaism. You follow the
rules, you can simultaneously be a good Jew and believe that God is
hostile, or nonexistant.

.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net