PF review

thalassocrat at nym.hush.com · 30 Nov 2007, 20:45 · from 2007-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: thalassocrat at nym.hush.com (thalassocrat at nym.hush.com)
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 07:45:16 +1100
Subject: (urth) PF review
Message-ID: <20071130204516.CE7F22283F at mailserver5.hushmail.com>

On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:40:53 +1100 bill reilly <gdeonn at yahoo.com> 
wrote:
>For those interested, I posted my review of Pirate Freedom, from 
>my review column in Realms of Fantasy magazine, on my blog: 
>   
>  http://community.livejournal.com/theinferior4/199336.html

That's an excellent review. 

One point: was it really to protect Chris that his father put him 
in a monastery? I thought about that, but how much protection would 
it actually offer, compared to other options? And Chris in the 
early period spends a fair chunk of time back home - Christmas, 8 
weeks over summer ...

His father seems to have some personal experience of monasteries: 
he thinks abbotts "bring you down". 

On Chris' hypocrisy: framing & limiting his whole confession is his 
assertion that he had no choice but to act badly - those times are 
not these times, and so on. But he did he have choices. A critical 
point for me is right at the beginning of his career, in Veracruz. 
He helps a priest minister to slaves; he could keep on doing that, 
but instead chooses to return to the Weald. 

Actually, I suppose the real beginning is just before that, when he 
excuses himself for stealing bread: God isn't going to send him to 
hell for any amount of venial sinning. Then he quickly progresses 
to assault, violently stealing a chicken. His older self helps him 
do it - a little scene encapsulating the whole of Chris' story.

Chris is indeed a bad man. But he has direct encounters with Christ 
(or at least believes he does). In one of them, Christ tells him 
that all that is needed is for Chris to love him. What to think 
about that? You can be a mobster and a pirate, but if you love 
Christ it doesn't matter? Is that good theology? For me it might 
serve as a reductio ad absurdum against that theology; but what's 
Wolfe's view?

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net